Opinions of scientists in environmental health


Expert concern

William Rea, MD

Founder and Director of the Center for Environmental Health, Past President of the Dallas , American Academy of Environmental Medicine.

Electromagnetic radiation sensitivity is the emerging health problem of the 21st century. It is imperative that health professionals, governments, schools and parents learn more about it. The risks to human health are significant “.

Martin Blank, Ph.

Associate Professor, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Researcher in Bioelectromagnetics; Author of the stress protein section of the BioInitiative Report.

“The body’s cells react to electromagnetic fields as potentially harmful. As well as other environmental toxins, including heavy metals and toxic chemicals. Thus, the DNA of living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at very low levels of exposure; and produces a biochemical stress response. Also, the scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are inadequate. And that we must protect ourselves from EMF exposure. In addition, this exposure is due to power lines, cell phones and the like, or risk the known consequences.therefore, the science is very solid and we should sit up and pay attention.”

Olle Johansson, Ph.D.

Associate Professor, Unit of Experimental Dermatology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Author of the BioInitiative Report section on Immune System.

“It is clear that several biological alterations, including modulation of the immune system, are present in electrohypersensitive people. Also, the widespread indifference and lack of sincere respect for the plight of these people must end.

It is also clear that something serious has happened and is happening. In addition, all aspects of the lives of electrohypersensitive people are at stake. Including the ability to work productively in society, have healthy relationships and find secure and permanent housing. The basic elements of life are increasingly inaccessible to a growing percentage of the world’s population.

I therefore recommend

I urge all governments to take the issue of electromagnetic health hazards seriously. And to act while there is still time. There is also too great a risk that ever-increasing RF-based communications technologies pose a real danger to humans.

Especially due to its exponential, continuous and uncontrolled growth. In addition, governments must act decisively to protect public health. Therefore, this action would be changing the exposure standards to be biologically based. Also, communicating the results of independent science on this topic and aggressively investigating the links to a multitude of associated medical conditions.”

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica

David Carpenter, MD

Professor, Environmental Health Sciences and Director, Institute for Health and Environment, School of Public Health, University at Albany,
Co-Editor of SUNY , The BioInitiative Report ( www.BioInitiative.org )

Electromagnetic fields are massless packets of energy, and visible light is what we know best. X-rays are also electromagnetic fields, but they are more energetic than visible light.

In addition, our concern is for those electromagnetic fields that are less energetic than visible light. Including those associated with electricity and those used for communications and in microwave ovens.

The fields associated with electricity are commonly referred to as “extremely low frequency” (ELF) fields. On the other hand, those used in communications and microwave ovens are called “radio frequency” (RF) fields.

Studies on individuals

Accordingly, they have shown that both ELF and RF exposure increase the cancer risk. And this occurs at intensities too low to cause tissue heating.

Unfortunately, all of our exposure standards are based on the false assumption that there are no hazardous effects at intensities that do not cause tissue heating. Thus, based on existing science, many public health experts believe that we may face an epidemic of cancers in the future.

This epidemic

So, it would be as a result of uncontrolled use of cell phones and increased exposure of the population to WiFi and other wireless devices. Therefore, it is important for all of us, and especially children, to restrict cell phone use, limit exposure to background levels of Wi-Fi.

In addition, that government and industry discover ways to enable the use of wireless devices without such a high risk of serious illness.

We also need to educate decision-makers that “business as usual” is unacceptable. Nor can the importance of this public health problem be underestimated.

Magda Havas, Ph.

Associate Professor, Environment and Resource Studies, Trent University, Canada.

Expert in radiofrequency radiation, electromagnetic fields, dirty electricity and ground current.
“Radiofrequency radiation and other forms of electromagnetic pollution are harmful in orders of magnitude well below existing guidelines.

Science is also one of the tools used by society to decide health policy. In the case of telecommunications equipment, such as cell phones, wireless networks, cell phone antennas, PDAs and portable phones, the science is being ignored.

In addition, the current guidelines need to be urgently re-examined by the government and scaled down to reflect the state of the science. An emerging public health crisis is looming and time is of the essence.

Whitney North Seymour, Jr., Esq.

Retired attorney; Former New York State Senator and U.S. Attorney, Co-Founder of the Southern District of NY , Natural Resources Defense Council

“Electromagnetic radiation is a very serious human health and environmental problem that needs immediate attention from Congress.

Thus, the BioInitiative Report is an important milestone in understanding the health risks of wireless technology. Likewise, every responsible elected official owes it to his or her constituents to learn and act on its findings and policy recommendations.”

B. Blake Levitt

Former New York Times reporter and author of Electromagnetic Fields, A Consumer’s Guide to the Issues and How to Protect Ourselves, and editor of Cell Towers, Wireless Convenience? Or environmental hazard?

Man-made environmental electromagnetic fields (EMF) in a range of frequencies are a serious environmental problem. However, most environmentalists know little about it, perhaps because the subject has been the province of physicists and engineers for so long.

Biologists, likewise, have lost touch with the fundamental inclusion of electromagnetism in the biological paradigm.

All living cells and, indeed, entire living things, regardless of genus or species, are coherent dynamic electrical systems. And totally dependent on bioelectricity for the most basic metabolic processes of life.

Furthermore, it turns out that most living things are fantastically sensitive to small EMF exposures. So, living cells interpret such exposures as part of our normal cellular activities (think heartbeat, brain waves, cell division itself, etc.).

The problem

It is that man-made electromagnetic exposures are not “normal”. Thus, they are artificial artifacts, with unusual intensities, signaling characteristics, pulsation patterns and waveforms, which do not exist in nature. And furthermore, they can deflect cells in many ways.

Then, all aspects of the ecosystem can be affected, including all living species of animals, humans, plants and even microorganisms in the water and soil.

Also, we are already seeing problems for sentinel species such as birds, bats and bees. Wildlife has been known to leave areas when cell phone towers are placed.

Radiofrequency radiation (RF)

The part of the electromagnetic spectrum used today in all things wireless is also a known immune system suppressor, among other things. In addition, RF is a form of energy air pollution and we must understand it as such. Humans are not the only species affected.

In short, the health of our planet may be endangered by this new environmental concern, in addition to all the others.

Therefore, citizens should call on the government to fund proper research and take the industry’s influence out of the dialogue. We now ignore this at our own risk”.

Eric Braverman, MD

Brain researcher, author of The Edge Effect and director of Path Medical in New York City and The PATH Foundation. Expert in the global impact of the brain on disease and health.

“There is no doubt that electromagnetic fields have a major effect on neurological functioning. They slow down our brain waves and affect our long-term mental clarity. We should minimize exposures as much as possible to optimize neurotransmitter levels and prevent health deterioration.”

Abraham R. Liboff, PhD

Research Professor Center for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida Co-Editor, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine

“The key point about electromagnetic pollution, which the public needs to realise, is that the intensity does not need to be high for a biological interaction to occur.

There is now considerable evidence that extremely weak signals can have physiological consequences. These interactive intensities are approximately 1000 times smaller than the threshold values previously estimated by otherwise knowledgeable theorists.

Those who, in their vainglorious approach to science, rejected all evidence to the contrary as inconsistent with their magnificent calculations. These flawed estimated thresholds have yet to be corrected, both by regulators and the media.

The general problem with environmental electromagnetism

It is therefore much deeper, not only concerned with power line frequencies, but also in the radio frequency range covered by cell phones.

Here, the public’s continued exposure to electromagnetic radiation is largely related to money. In fact, the tens of billions of dollars in sales found in the cell phone industry make it mandatory for corporate leaders to instinctively deny any hint of danger.


Likewise, there may be hope for the future, knowing that weakly intense electromagnetic interactions can be used for both good and bad.

The fact that such fields are biologically effective also implies the likelihood of medical applications, something that is happening now.

As this happens, I believe that it will make us more aware of how our bodies react to electromagnetism. Therefore, it should be even clearer to all concerned that there is reason to be very, very careful about environmental electromagnetic fields.”

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD

Professor at Orebro University Hospital, Sweden. World-renowned expert on cell phones, cordless phones, brain tumors and the safety of wireless radiofrequency and microwave radiation. He is co-author of the section of Dr. Hardell’s BioInitiative Report on brain tumors.

“The evidence for the risks of prolonged use of cell phones and cordless phones is quite strong when you look at people who have used these devices for 10 years or more, and when they are used primarily on one side of the head.

Recent studies reporting no increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas have not looked at regular users, use for ten years or more. and do not look at the part of the brain that would reasonably be exposed to produce a tumor.”

Libby Kelley, MA

MA Administrative Secretary International Commission on Electromagnetic Safety; Founder; Wireless Technology Impacts Council; Co-Producer of documentary, “Public Exposure: DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution”, Electromagnetic Fields Environmental Consultant and lead appellant in challenging FCC radiofrequency radiation human exposure guidelines, 1997-2000 (see below).www.icems.eu)

Standards for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation for personal wireless communications devices, and for environmental exposure to wireless transmitters, are established by national governments to guide the use of wireless communications devices and for wireless transmitters. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission are responsible for setting these standards.

The Wireless Technology Impacts Council

It considers these exposure standards to be inadequate. Since they are based on the effects of warming and are not adapted to the low-level cumulative exposure conditions in which the public now lives. These standards are also designed for short-term acute exposure conditions. And they fail to acknowledge the medical evidence pointing to increased risks and actual harm resulting from chronic and intermittent exposure. Federal and state public health agencies are not officially addressing what many concerned scientists and physicians now see as an emerging public health problem.

There are no health surveillance or corrective response systems in place to advise citizens about exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As wireless technology evolves, background environmental levels increase, creating electrical pollution conditions that become pervasive and more invasive.

We recommend

Strongly encourage consumers, manufacturers, utility providers and legislators to reduce, eliminate and mitigate EMR exposure conditions and support bio-based standards.

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica

James S. Turner, Esq.

Chairman of the Board, Co-author of Citizens for Health, Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life Attorney, Swankin-Turner, Washington, DC.

“According to the BioInitiative Report.

A rationale for a biologically based public exposure standard for electromagnetic fields. From electrical and electronic appliances, power lines and wireless devices. For example, cell phones, cordless phones, mobile antennas, transmission and broadcast towers.

Likewise, we live in an invisible fog of electromagnetic fields.

In addition, thirty years of science, including more than 2,000 peer-reviewed studies, show that it exposes us to serious health risks . Also, the increase in cases of Alzheimer’s disease, breast cancer, Lou Gehrig’s disease. Also, hypersensitivity of the immune system to electromagnetic fields.

Therefore, the public must make politicians and public officials aware of the need to update the decades-old EMF public health standards. And also, about the need to update the decades-old EMF public health standards. This report tells us how.

Camilla Rees, MBA

Executive Director of MBA, Broad Perspective Health, a Patient Education and Advocacy Limited Liability Company.

United States, also spends more than 2 trillion dollars a year in health care. In addition, of which about 78% comes from people suffering from chronic diseases. However, without exploring, nor adequately understanding what factors, including EMF/RF, contribute to the imbalances taking place in people’s bodies in the first place.

BioInitiative Report

Therefore, after reading the BioInitiatived Report, it should come as a surprise to legislators. Thus, in view of the increasing levels of EMF/RF exposure in our environment.

As a result, about 50% of Americans are currently living with a chronic disease.

I weep for the people who suffer unnecessarily from these diseases. I also hope that our government leaders will be more aware of the role that electromagnetic factors play in disease.

In addition, to the costs of medical care. As well as, the erosion of quality of life, not to mention, productivity in the United States.”

L. Lloyd Morgan, BS Electronic Engineering

B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Director of the U.S. Central Brain Tumor Registry, Member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, Member of the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium*.

“Thus, all indications are that cell phones cause brain tumors, salivary gland tumors and eye cancer.

However, because the cell phone industry provides a substantial part of the funding for research, this reality is hidden from the general public.

In addition, the Interphone studio

A research project conducted by 13 countries, substantially funded by the cell phone industry. It has consistently shown that the use of a cell phone protects the user from the risk of brain tumor.

Need I say more?

Thus, it is time for fully independent studies to be funded by those government agencies whose charter is based on protecting their citizens.

To make the truth about the health hazards of highly harmful microwave radiation clear and well known.”

* For identification purposes only: All statements are mine and mine alone. Therefore, they do not represent positions or opinions of the U.S. Central Brain Tumor Registry, the Bioelectromagnetics Society, or the Epidemiologic Brain Tumor Consortia.

Janet Newton

President of the EMR Policy Institute


“The current radiofrequency radiation safety policy in the United States does not protect the public. In addition, there are currently more than 260 million wireless subscribers in the United States. It is also a demand that drives the continued construction of antenna sites.

Specifically, in residential and commercial neighborhoods, including near schools, day care and senior centers, and in the workplace. Also, the January 2008 report issued by the committee of the National Academy of Sciences, whose task was to examine the needs.

In addition, research gaps on the biological effects of exposure to these antennas. This report notes that research studies, to date, do not adequately represent the reality of exposure.

Specifically, the studies:

1) They assume a single antenna

Instead of the typical arrangements of a minimum of four to six antennas per site. Thus underestimating the exposure intensities.

2) They do not belong to commonly used multi-element base station antennas.

Therefore, multiple frequency exposures are not taken into account.

3) Lack of models of various heights for men, women and children of various ages.

For use in the characterization of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) distributions for cell phone, wireless computer and base station exposures and…

4) Does not take into account absorption effects

Of the exposures from the various radiofrequency emitting devices to which the public is often exposed simultaneously.

At this time, a federal research strategy is urgently needed in order to address these serious deficiencies in the science on which our government bases health policy.”

Prof. Livio Giuliani, PhD

Ph.D. Spokesman of the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (www.icems.eu). Deputy Director of the Italian National Institute for the Protection and Safety of Workers, East Venice and South Tyrol; Professor, Faculty of Biochemistry, University of Camerino, Italy.

The Venice Resolution

Initiated by the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) on 6 June 2008, and currently signed by nearly 50 peer-reviewed scientists worldwide.

It states in part: “We are forced to confirm the existence of non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields on living matter. Which, therefore, seem to occur at all levels of research, from molecular to epidemiological. Recent epidemiological evidence is stronger than before.

We recognize the growing public health problem known as electrohypersensitivity. We strongly recommendlimited use of cell phones and similar devices by young children and adolescents .

And we call on governments to apply the Precautionary Principle as an interim measure, pending the development of more biologically relevant exposure standards”.

Professor Jacqueline McGlade

Executive Director, Advisor to the European Environment Agency for European Union countries under the European Commission

“There are many examples illustrating non-compliance with the Precautionary Principle in the past. Therefore. have caused serious and very often irreversible damage to both health and the environment.

Therefore, it is likely that the appropriate, preventive and proportionate actions to be taken today. Pto avoid plausible and potentially serious threats to health from electromagnetic fields, be considered as prudent and wise from future perspectives”.

Paul J. Rosch, MD

M.D., Clinical Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry, New York Medical College; Honorary Vice-President, International Association for Stress Management; Diplomate, National Board of Medical Examiners; Full Member, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences; Member of the Royal Society of Medicine; Member Emeritus, Society of Bioelectromagnetism.

Likewise, claims that cell phones do not pose any health hazards. They are supported only by Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits. Moreover, these security standards have been written by the telecommunications industries decades ago, based on studies that they themselves funded.

They have also made the erroneous assumption that the only harm that could come from radiofrequency emissions from mobile phones would therefore be a thermal or heating action, since such non-thermal fields cannot have biological effects.

The late Dr. Ross Adey refuted this three decades ago. By demonstrating that very similar radio frequency fields, with certain carrier and modulation frequencies. They had insufficient energy to produce any heating and could also cause the release of calcium ions from the cells.

Non-thermal effects

Since then, numerous research reports have confirmed that non-thermal effects. For example, from cell phones, tower transmitters, power lines and other artificial sources, can significantly affect various tissues and physiological functions.


We are bathed in a growing sea of radiation from exposure to all of the above. In addition to household appliances, computers, Bluetooth devices. As well as, wifi facilities and more than 2,000 communication satellites in outer space. Which fill us with signals to GPS receivers.

In addition, new WiMax transmitters on cell towers, which have a range of up to two square miles. So, compared to 300 feet of wifi, they will soon turn the core of North America into a major electromagnetic hot spot. Children are more affected because their brains are still developing and their skulls are thinner.

A two-minute call

It can alter a child’s brain function for up to one hour . For this reason, some countries prohibit its sale or advise against its use by children under 18 years of age. Por el contrario, este es el segmento de población que, en estos momentos, es el blanco de una campaña publicitaria estadounidense de $ 2 mil millones.

And it sees“tweens” (children between the ages of 8 and 12) as the next big market for cell phones. Firefly and Barbie mobile phones are also being promoted for children between 6 and 8 years old.

In general

No cumulative effect is seen, and talking on a cell phone for just one hour a day for ten years can add up to 10,000 watts of radiation. That’s ten times more than sticking your head in a microwave oven. Women pregnantwomen may also have a higher risk. According to a study that states that those who children, born of Mothers who used a mobile phone only two or three times a day during pregnancy showed a dramatic increase in the levels of hyperactivity, as well as other emotional and behavioral problems.

For the 30% of children who had also used a mobile phone by the age of 7 years, the incidence of behavioural problems was as much as 80% higher! It is debatable whether ontogeny (embryonic development) recapitulates phylogeny, but it is clear that lower life forms are much more sensitive. If the positive electrode of a 1.5-volt battery is placed in the Pacific Ocean in San Francisco and the negative electrode in San Diego, sharks in the middle of these cities can detect the few billionths of a volt electric field.

Electromagnetic fields have also been implicated in the recent massive but mysterious disappearance of bee colonies, essential for the pollination of more than 90 commercial crops. As Albert Einstein warned, “if the bee were to disappear from the surface of the globe, man would have only four years to live”.


All life onEarth has evolved under the influence of solar radiation and geomagnetic forces. We have learned not only to adapt to them but also, in some cases, to use them.

The health of all living systems (ranging from a cell, tissue, organ or person to a family, organization or nation) depends on good communication. Good communication both inside and outside the environment.

All communication in the body is eventually carried out through very subtle electromagnetic signals between cells. Which is beinginterrupted by artificial electro-pollution to which we have not had time to adapt.

As Alvin Toffler emphasized in Future Shock, too much change in too little time means severe stress due to adaptive failures. The adverse effects of electromagnetic pollution can take decades to become apparent . Although some, such as. carcinogenicity, are already beginning to be visible.

This gigantic experiment on our children and grandchildren

It could result in massive damage to mind and body . With the potential to produce adisaster of unprecedented proportions. Unless proper precautions are implemented immediately. At the same time, it should be recognised that new electromagnetic therapies have been shown to benefit stress-related disorders.

These range from anxiety, depression and insomnia to arthritis, migraines and tension headaches. As demonstrated in Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, they can be much safer and more effective than drugs, so we must avoid acting overzealously.

Samuel Milham MD, MPH

Doctor of Medicine. Epidemiological doctor in occupational epidemiology. First scientist to report an increase in leukemia and other cancers in electrical workers and to demonstrate that the childhood age peak in leukemia emerged along with the spread of residential electrification.

“Very recently, new research has revealed that almost all of the human plagues that arose throughout the 20th century.such as common acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children, female breast cancer, malignant melanoma, or even asthma, can be caused by a variety of diseases. linked, in some way, to our use of electricity..

There is an urgent need for governments and individuals to take the necessary measures . In order to minimize personal and community exposure to electromagnetic fields, “


Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium

September 13, 2017

Therefore, we, the undersigned, more than 180 scientists and physicians from 36 countrieswe recommend a moratorium on deployment of the fifth generation of telecommunications, 5G. This is until the potential hazards to human health and the environment have been investigated by scientists independent of industry.

Likewise, 5G will significantly increase exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). That is, radio frequency (RF) compared to the existing 2G, 3G, 4G, WIFI, etc.. Thus, RF EMFs have been shown to be harmful to humans and the environment.

5G leads to massive increase in mandatory wireless radiation exposure

5G technology is effective only at close range. In addition, it is poorly transmitted through solid material. Therefore, many new antennas will be required. And also, large-scale deployment will result in antennas every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas . Thus massively increasing the mandatory exposure.

With“the ever-increasing use of wireless technologies”

No one can avoid exposure. Because it adds an increasing number of 5G transmitters. Even within the home, stores and hospitals. Estimating “10 to 20 billion connections“.

For example, refrigerators, washing machines, surveillance cameras, cars and buses, etc., which will be part of the Internet of Things. All these factors may also lead to a substantial increase in the total long-term exposure to EU citizens.

scientists' views on high exposure to electromagnetic radiation

Scientists’ views on EMF exposure

The harmful effects of RF EMF exposure are already proven.

More than 230 scientists from over 40 countries have expressed their“serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMFs. Generated by electrical and wireless devices, already before the further launch of 5G. They also refer to the fact that “numerous recent scientific publications have also shown that EMFs affect living organisms …”.

And they do this at levels far below international and national guidelines.” Ç

On the other hand, after the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015.

Additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF EMFs from wireless technology. Likewise, the largest study in the world, conducted by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) ( US$25 million), shows a statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF.

ICNIRP Criteria

On the other hand, this study showed that the levels had been below the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection) criteria followed by most countries.

These results also support findings in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumor risk. A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reports demonstrate harm to human health from EMFs.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC)

The cancer agency of the World Health Organization(WHO), likewise, concluded that EMF frequencies from 30 KHz to 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).

However, new studies such as the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations, including the latest studies on cell phone use and brain cancer risks, also confirm that RF EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.

the 2016 EUROPAEM EMF Guide

Also, the 2016 EUROPAEM EMF Guidance states that“there is strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain types of cancer . And also Alzheimer’s disease and male infertility….

Common symptoms of EHS

Similarly, common symptoms of EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue and flu-like symptoms.”

Also, an increasing part of the European population is affected by health symptoms. Which for many years have been related to exposure to electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation in the scientific literature.

The International Scientific Statement on EHS and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), Brussels 2015.

It states that: “Based on our current scientific knowledge, we thus urge all national and international bodies and institutions. In particular the World Health Organisation (WHO), to recognise EHS and MCS as true medical conditions.

Which, acting as sentinel diseases, may create a major public health problem in the coming years. That is, in all countries that apply the unrestricted use of technologies based on wireless electromagnetic fields and commercialized chemicals …


Inaction, likewise, is a cost to society and can no longer be an option … Therefore, we unanimously recognize this serious danger to public health . Consequently, it urgently requires recognition of this condition at all international levels,…

And, above all, that important primary prevention measures be adopted and prioritised, as well as to tackle this global pan-epidemic in perspective.


First of all, the Precautionary Principle (UNESCO) was adopted by the EU in 2005. It states: “Where human activities may lead to a morally unacceptable, scientifically possible but uncertain hazard, measures must be taken to avoid or reduce that hazard.

Secondly, Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): Therefore, “Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radiofrequency emitted by cell phones. And in particular, exposure in children and young people, for whom the risk of head tumors appears higher .


In addition, the Assembly recommended the implementation of the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle, i.e., the level as low as reasonably possible. Therefore taking into account not only the so-called thermal effects, but also athermal effects. [no térmicos] or biological emission or radiation of EMFG”. As well as,“improving the risk assessment criteria and also, the quality of the assessment by creating a standard risk scale“. The Nuremberg Code of Medical Ethics (1949) applies to all experiments on human subjects. It also includes the deployment of 5G with the new RF EMF exposure.

Scientific studies

Therefore, all such experiments should be designed and based “on the results obtained from previous animal experimentation. Also, in addition to full knowledge of the natural history of the disease or problem under study, so that the anticipated results justify the conduct of the experiment (….). Also, no experiment should be performed when there is an a priori reason. Thus, to assume that death or irreparable injury may occur. Except, in experiments in which the research physicians are also experimental subjects.” (Nuremberg Code points 3 and 5).

The European Environment Agency (EEA)

Moreover, scientific studies already published show that there is “a priori reason to assume real health risks. In addition, the European Environment Agency (EEA) is warning about “The radiation risk of everyday devices”, despite the fact that radiation is below WHO/ICNIRP standards.

Also, the EEA concludes:“There are numerous examples in the past which, by not using the precautionary principle, have led to serious and often irreversible damage to health and the environment…. In addition, harmful exposures could spread before there is “categorical” evidence from long-term exposures. As well as, from a biological understanding [mecanismo] of the damage they may cause.”

“Safety Guidelines protect industry, not health”.

In addition, the current ICNIRP “safety guidelines” are outdated. All the evidence of harm mentioned above, likewise, thus arises, even though the radiation is below the said ICNIRP “safety guidelines”.

Therefore, new safety standards are needed. However, the reason for the misleading guidelines is that “the conflict of interest of ICNIRP members, due therefore, to their relationships with the telecommunications or electricity industry.

Therefore, they undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation. In addition, cancer risk assessment needs to include scientists with expertise in medicine, especially oncology.”

The current ICNIRP / WHO EMF guidelines

They are also based on the outdated assumption that “the fundamental effect of exposure to health-relevant RF EMFs . Also, human safety is the heating of exposed tissue.”

However, scientists have shown that many different types of diseases and harmful effects occur without heating (“non-thermal effect”) . And this occurs at radiation levels well below ICNIRP guidelines.


1)Therefore, to take all reasonable measures to stop the expansion of 5G RF EMF.

Until independent scientists can assure that 5G and the total radiation levels caused by RF EMF (5G along with 2G, 3G, 4G and WiFi) will not be harmful to the EU citizenry.

Especially for babies, children and pregnant women, as well as for the environment.

2) Recommend that all EU countries

Especially your radiation safety agencies, follow Resolution 1815 and inform the public. Thus, including education and medical professionals. About the health risks from RF EMF radiation. Also, how and why to avoid wireless communication. In particular, in/nearday care centers, schools, homes, workplaces, hospitals and senior centers.

3) Immediately appoint

Therefore, without industry influence, an EU working group on EMF and health, of independent and truly impartial scientists, and also, without conflicts of interest1, to reassess health risks and:

a)Also decide on new safe “maximum total exposure standards” for all wireless communications within the EU.

b) In addition, study the total and cumulative exposure affecting EU citizens.

c) Also, create standards that are required/applied in the EU. Even on how to avoid exposure that exceeds the new EU “maximum total exposure standards” for all types of electromagnetic fields. Above all, to protect citizens, especially babies, children and pregnant women.

4) To prevent the wireless and telecommunications industry from

So, through your lobbying organizations, persuade European officials to make decisions about encouraging the spread of RF radiation, including 5G in Europe.

5) Favour and implement wired rather than wireless digital telecommunications.

We also expect a response from you no later than October 31, 2017 to the first two signatories. On what measures they will take to protect EU inhabitants against RF EMF and especially 5G radiation. In addition, this appeal and its response will be available to the public.

Respectfully submitted

Rainer Nyberg, EdD, Professor Emeritus (Åbo Akademi), Vasa, Finland (NRNyberg@abo.fi)
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor (assoc) Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden (lennart.hardell@regionorebrolan.se)

Signatories to Scientists’ 5G Appeal

Note: The endorsements are personal and not necessarily supported by the affiliated universities or organizations.


Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Public Health Officer, Salzburg

Marie-Claire Cammaerts, Dr, retired, Free University of Brussels, Bruxelles

Marko Markov, Professor Emeritus, Ph.D. in biophysics, Sofia University, Research international

Stella Canna Michaelidou, Dr, Chemist Expert on Environment, Health and Food Safety, President of the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health

Marjukka Hagström, LL.M, M.Soc.Sc., Senior researcher, The Finnish Electrosensitivity Foundation, Turku
Osmo Hänninen, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland; Editor-In-Chief, Pathophysiology, Kuopio Georgiy Ostroumov, PhD (in the field of RF EMF), independent researcher

Marc Arazi, MD, Physician (Whistleblower on Phonegate international scandal), Nogent-sur-Marne
Dominique Belpomme, MD, MSc, Full Professor in Medical Oncology; Director of ECERI, Paris University, Paris & European Cancer and Environment Research Institute, Brussels.
Philippe Irigaray, PhD, Scientific Director, Association for Research on Treatment against Cancer (ARTAC), Paris; European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (ECERI), Brussels.
Vincent Lauer, Eng. ECP, Independent Researcher, La Chapelle sur Erdre.
Annie J Sasco, MD, DrPH, Former Director of Research, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Former Chief of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the International Agency for Research on Cancer and Former Acting Chief of Program for Cancer Control, World Health Organization, Bordeaux.


Franz Adlkofer, MD, Professor, Pandora-Foundation for Independent Research
Christine Aschermann, MD (retired) member of the Kompetenzinitiative e.V., Leutkirch Mario Babilon, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University Stuttgart
Wolf Bergmann, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Freiburg, Germany.
Rainer Frentzel-Beyme, MD, Professor emeritus, University of Bremen.
Helmut Breunig, Diploma degree in forestry, Specialty: Radio frequency injuries on trees around phone masts, Osterode am Harz
Klaus Buchner, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, MEP – Member of the European Parliament, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., München
Horst Eger, Dr. med., Ärztlicher Qualitätszirkel “Elektromagnetische Felder in der Medizin – Diagnostik, Therapie, Umwelt”, Naila
Karl Hecht, Dr, Professor of pathophysiology and neurophysiology (Emeritus of the Medical center Charite), Berlin
Peter Hensinger, MA, diagnose:funk, consumer protection organisation, Stuttgart
Markus Kern, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Kempten
Florian M. König, Dr.Sc. Man. Dir. & Science Header of the Company/Institute “Florian König Enterprises GmbH”.
Andrea Leute, Dr. med., Ärzteinitiative Mobilfunk Allgäu-Bodensee-Oberschwaben, Überlingen
Martin Lion, Dr. med., Allgemeinmedizin – Homöopathie, Ulm
Joachim Mutter, Dr. med., Paracelsus Clinic / Switzerland, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Murg
Gertraud Teuchert-Noodt, Dr., Professorin der Neurobiologie i.R., Universität Bielefeld
Peter Ohnsorge, Dr. med., European Academy for Environmental Medicine
Karl Richter, Dr. phil., Professor, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., St. Ingbert, Germany
Claus Scheingraber, Dr. med. dent., German Working Group Electro-Biology, Brunnthal,
Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam, Dr.med., Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy e.V., Bamberg, Germany.
Werner Thiede, Dr. theol., Professor, Pfarrer der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Landeskirche in Bayern und Publizist, Neuhausen
Helmut Wagner, Dr. med., Ophthalmologist, Stuttgart
Harald Walach, Professor, PhD in psychology, PhD in theory and history of science, Change Health Science Institute, Berlin; affiliation: Witten-Herdecke University, Poznan Medical University, Poland
Ulrich Warnke, Dr.rer.nat., Academic Superior Council (retired) University of Saarland
Isabel Wilke, Diplom-Biologin, Editor ElektrosmogReport, Kassel/Berlin
Roland Wolff, Dipl.-Phys., Medical Physicist, Bremen
Ortwin Zais, PhD (Dr. med.), European Academy for Environmental Medicine


Christos Georgiou, PhD, Member, Scientific Secretariat of ICEMS; Professor of Biochemistry, Biology Department, University of Patras, Patras
Theodore P. Metsis, PhD, Electrical, Mechanical, Environmental Engineer, Consultant, Athens

5G - opinions


Domenico Agrusta, Medicine and surgery, specialist in dentistry (Odontostomatologia) self-employed, Member of ISDE, Taranto
Fernanda Amicarelli, Full Professor in Applied Biology, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila
Fiorella Belpoggi, Dr., Director, Research Department, Ramazzini Institute, Bologna
Sergio Bernasconi, Full Professor of Pediatrics, former Director, Pediatric Department, Editor emeritus: Italian Journal of Pediatrics, University of Parma
Dr Franco Berrino, MD, PhD, former Director, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Istitutonazionale dei Tumori, Milan
Ernesto Burgio, MD, Pediatrician, ECERI – European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (Bruxelles)
Dr Franco Cherubini, Degree in medicine and surgery, Self-employed, Vetralla
Dott. Agostino Di Ciaula, President of Scientific Committee, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE Italy, Arezzo
Dott. Andrea Cormano, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Benevento Ugo Corrieri, Degree in medicine and surgery at Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Teacher at Scuola Romana di Psicoterapia Familiare, President of ISDE-Doctors for the Environment in Grosseto, Coordinator of ISDE-Doctors for the Environment for Central Italy, Grosseto- Rome
Dr Patrizia Difonte, Physician, Surgeon, General practitioner and occupational medicine, Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili, Lonate Pozzolo (Varese)
Anna Maria Falasconi, Medical Doctor, Primary Care Pediatrician, National Health System, Rome
Dott. Filippo Maria di FavaLaurea in Medicina e Chirurgia, Libero professionista, Roma
Dr. Mario Frusi, MD, medico, Cuneo Dr. Stefano Gallozzi, Astrophysician and technologist at the INAF Italian National Astrophysical Institute in the Observatory, President of the Comitato di Tutela e Salvaguardia dell’Ambiente in Monte Porzio Catone (ONLUS association), Rome.
Dott. Roberto Gava, Pharmacologist and Toxicologist, ISDE, Padova
Teresa Pia Anna Maria Del Gaudio, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, specialist in pediatrics, Medical Manager, ASL Salerno, Roccagloriosa (SA), Italy
Valerio Gennaro, MD, PhD, Head ,Liguria Mesothelioma Registry (COR Liguria), UO Clinical Epidemiology (IST Nord – CBA); IRCCS Policlinico Ospedale San Martino National Cancer Research Institute (IST), Genoa
Patrizia Gentilini, Degree in Medicine (specialization in Oncology and Hematology). ISDE (International Society Doctor’s for Environment), FORLI’.
Livio Giuliani, PhD, Professor, Università dell’Abruzzo – Corso di Laurea in Fisiatria, Chieti Angelo Levis, PhD. Professor, Biologist, University of Padua Roberto Lucchini, MD, Professor of Occupational Medicine, University of Brescia
Fiorenzo Marinelli, PhD, Institute of Molecular Genetics (IGM), National Research Council (CNR), Member of the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), Bologna,
Antonio Maria Pasciuto, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, Specialist in Internal Medicine, President of ASSIMAS (Associazione Italiana Medicina Ambiente e Salute), Rome
Dott. Carlo Ratti, MD, Ordine dei Medici della SPEZIA, Genova
Ruggero Ridolfi, MD, Oncologist Endocrinologist, ISDE, Forlì-Cesena
Dr. Med. Sandro RinaldiLaurea in medicine and surgery; specialization in Allergology; specialization in Ematology. General practitioner contracted with the Bolzano Health Care Agency, Terlano (BZ)
Massimo Melelli Roia, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Perugia
Dott. Roberto RomiziPresident, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Arezzo, Italy
Dott.ssa Ida Santellocco, MD, Chirurgeon, Pediatrics, chirurgeon – pediatrician, Rome
Massimo Scalia, Coordinator of the Bioelectromagnetism Section of CIRPS (Interuniversity Research Center for Sustainable Development)
Alessandro Solerio, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, Self-employed, homeopath, Sanremo
Franco Verzella, MD, physician, practice dedicated to autistic children, Bologna,
Myriam Zucca, Dr. ssa, Medical Director, Dermatology, Cagliari University Hospital, Sardinia


Pierre Mallia, MD PhD CBiol MPhil MA(Law) DipICGP MMCFD MRCP MRCP FRCGP, Professor of Family Medicine, Bioethics & Patients’ Rights; Chairperson National Health Ethics Committee, Dept. of Health Coordinator Bioethics Research Programme, Univ. of Malta; President, Malta College of Family Doctors


Hugo Schooneveld, PhD, Retired Associate professor (Wageningen Agricultural University), Advisor to the Dutch EHS Foundation, former president of ‘Stichting elektro- hypersensitivity’, Wageningen


Paulo Vale, PhD, Auxiliary Researcher, Sea and Marine Resources Department, The Portuguese Sea and Atmosphere Institute, Lisbon


Igor Belyaev, PhD, Dr.Sc, Associate Professor, Cancer Research Institute, BMC SAS, Bratislava Jan Jakus, MD, PhD, DSc. Professor, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin
Ladislav Janousek, PhD, Professor, Department of Electromagnetic and Biomedical Engineering , Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Zilina, Žilina
Michal Teplan, PhD, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak academy of sciences, Bratislava


Alfonso Balmori, BSc, Master in Environmental Education, Biologist. Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid José Luis Bardasano, PhD, Biologist and Physician, Prof. of Medical Bioelectomagnetism, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid.
Pilar Muñoz-Calero, MD, President of the Fundación Alborada, Co-director of the Chair of Pathology and Environment, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid Miguel Lopez-Lazaro, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville.
María Elena López Martín, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) Enrique A. Navarro, PhD, Professor, University of Valencia, Valencia
Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Chief of Section, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Ceferino Maestu Unturbe, Ph.D, Prof., Director of the Bioelectromagnetism Laboratory of the Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM).


Mikko Ahonen, PhD, researcher, Sundsvall
Michael Carlberg, MSc, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro
Mikael Eriksson, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Skane University, Hospital, Lund
Lena Hedendahl, MD, Independent Environment and Health Research, Luleå Olle Johansson, Associate Professor, Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm
Gunilla Ladberg, PhD, Member of the Board of the Swedish association Vågbrytaren, Lidingö
Leif G. Salford, MD, PhD, Senior Professor of Neurosurgery, Director of the Rausing Laboratory for Translational NeuroOncology, Lund University, Lund
Elsy-Britt Schildt, MD, PhD, Senior Consultant, Department of Oncology and Radiation, County Hospital, Kalmar
Fredrik Söderqvist, PhD, Epidemiologist, Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Västerås


Daniel Favre, Dr. phil., Biologist, Independent Researcher, Brent
Peter Meier, Dr.Med. Facharzt für Innere Medizin FMH, M.Sc. Präventivmedizin, Mitglied der European Academy for Environmental Medicine, Sissach


Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD, BMBS, Founder of PHIRE (Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment) Trustee Radiation Research Trust, Medical Advisor ORSAA (Oceana Radiofrequency Advisory Association), Medical Advisor ES-UK, Soton
David Gee, Visiting Fellow, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London
Andrew Goldsworthy, BSc, PhD, Lecturer in Biology (retired), Imperial College London, Monmouth
Alasdair Philips, BSc, DAgE, Professional engineer, Powerwatch
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, MBBS, MA, MSc, PhD , Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Occupational Health, Guy’s and St. Joseph’s Hospital, London, UK. St. Thomas’ NHS Trust; Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University, London
Sarah Starkey, PhD, Independent Neuroscience and Environmental Health Research.
Andrew Tresidder, MD, MBBS, MRCGP, Somerset GP

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica



Sinerik Ayrapetyan, PhD, Professor, Life Sciences International Postgraduate Educational Center, UNESCO Chair in Life Sciences, Yerevan, Head of Research Council and Chairholder of UNESCO Chair


Priyanka Bandara, PhD, Environmental Health Consultant, Castle Hill/Sydney, NSW
Katherine Georgouras, OAM, DDM, FACD, Professor of Dermatology, (semiretired) ,Kenthurst NSW
Ray Kearney OAM, PhD, Honorary Assoc. Professor (retired), Department of Medicine, University of Sydney
Don Maisch, PhD, Independent researcher, author of “The Procrustean Approach”, Lindisfarne, Tasmania
May Murray, PhD, Independent Environmental Health researcher, Canberra
Elena Pirogova, PhD, Associate Professor, Biomed Eng, BEng (Hons) Chem En, Discipline of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University
Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 9
Charles Teo, AM, MBBS, Professor, Neurosurgeon, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Sydney
Steve Weller, BSc, Founding member of ORSSA, Brisbane

5G opinions


Orlando Furtado Vieira Filho, PhD, Professor, Cellular & Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Claudio Enrique Fernández-Rodríguez, PhD, MSEE, Professor, Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, IFRS, Canoas
Alvaro Augusto A. de Salles, PhD, Full Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre
Francisco de Assis Ferreira Tejo (retired) D.Sc., Professor, Grupo de Eletromagnetismo Computacional e Bioeletromagnetismo, Electrical Engineering Dept, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande


Frank Clegg, CEO, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST); Former President of Microsoft Canada
Paul Héroux, PhD, Occupational Health Program Director, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Medicine, Montreal, PQ
Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP, Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto,
Malcolm Paterson, PhD, Director, Research Initiatives, BC Cancer Agency Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC
Michael A. Persinger, PhD, Professor, Biomolecular Sciences, Behavioural Neuroscience and Human Studies, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario
Magda Havas, Associate Professor, Trent University, Canada


Wenjun Sun, PhD, Professor, Bioelectromagnetics Key Laboratory, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou
Minglian Wang, M.M. PhD, Associate Professor, College of Life Science & Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology (BJUT), Beijing


Carlos Sosa, MD, University of Antioquia, Medellín

Nasr Radwan, Prof. Dr., Cairo University, Faculty of Science, Cairo

Ganesh Chandra Jagetia, Professor, Just retired from Department of Zoology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Udaipur Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical & Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
R. S. Sharma, PhD, Head, Scientist – G & Sr. DDG, Div. of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health and Chief Project Coordinator – EMF Health Project India, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi


Amirnader Emami Razavi, PhD, Executive Manager and Principal Investigator of Iran, National Tumor Bank, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Dr. Masood Sepehrimanesh, PhD, Assistant Professor, Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center, Guilan Universtiy of Medical Sciences, Rasht


Iris Atzmon, MPH, Epidemiology, University of Haifa, Author of “The Cellular, not what you thought!”, Haifa
Michael Peleg, M.Sc., Radio Communications Engineer and Researcher, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
Elihu D Richter, MD MPH, Professor, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem
Yael Stein, MD, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem
Danny Wolf, MD, Pediatrician, Clialit Health Services Raziel, Netanya Herzelia


Hidetake Miyata, PhD, Associate professor, Department of Physics. Tohoku University


Mohammed Saleh Al Salameh, PhD, Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science & Technology, Irbid

KOREA (South)

Kiwon Song, PhD, Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul
Young Hwan Ahn, MD PhD, Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou Univeristy School of Medicine, Suwon


Damian Wojcik, MD, MBChB, Medical director/ Northland Environmental health Clinic, Whangare, Northland


Aneyo Idowu Ayisat, M.Sc., Lecturer, Environmental Biology Unit, Biological Science Department, Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos


Dr Najam Siddiqi, MBBS, PhD, Associate Professor of Anatomy, Oman Medical College, Sohar


Yury Grigoriev, Professor, M. Dr Sci., Federal. Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow
Maxim V. Trushin, PhD, Associate Professor, Kazan Federal University, Kazan

5G opinions


Osman Cerezci, Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University, Adapazarı
Suleyman Dasdag, PhD, Prof. Dr., Biophysics Department, Medical School, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Uskudar, Istanbul
Onur Elmas, MD, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Of Physiology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla
Ayse Inhan Garip, Assoc. Prof., School of Medicine, Biophysics Dept., Marmara Univ., Istanbul
Suleyman Kaplan, PhD, Professor, President of Turkish Society for Stereology, Board member of Journal Chemical Neuroanatomy (Elsevier), Board member of Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure (Elsevier), Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun
Fulya Kunter, Assistant Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul
Selim Şeker, Professor Dr., Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Bogazici University
Nesrin Seyhan, Prof. Dr., Gazi University Medical Faculty, Founder Head, Biophysics Department; Founding Director, Gazi Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Centre (GNRK), Ankara


Olexandr Tsybulin, PhD, Department of Biophysics, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
Igor Yakymenko, Prof. Dr, Department of Biochemistry and Environmental Control , National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv


David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, A Collaborating Centre of the World Health Organization, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY
Barry Castleman, ScD, Environmental Consultant, Garrett Park, MD
Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Visiting Prof. Medicine, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center & Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School (Turkey); Pres., Environmental Health Trust, Teton Village, WY
Paul Doyon, MA, MAT, EMRS, Independent Researcher, Doyon Independent Research, CA
Arthur Firstenberg, B.A., EMF researcher and author, president Cellular Phone Task Force, New York
Beatrice A. Golomb, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
Peter F. Infante, DrPH, Managing Member, Peter F. Infante Consulting, LLC, VA
Toril H. Jelter, MD, MDI Wellness Center, CA
Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Tucson, AZ
Henry Lai, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
B. Blake Levitt, medical/science journalist, former New York Times contributor, EMF researcher and author
Trevor G Marshall, ME, PhD, Director, Autoimmunity Research Foundation, CA
Ronald Melnick, PhD, Senior Toxicologist, (Retired RF-section leader) US National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

L. Lloyd Morgan, Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Health Trust, Board Member, International EMF Alliance (IEMFA), CA
S. M. J. Mortazavi, PhD, Professor of Medical Physics, Visiting Scientist, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Martin Pall, BA, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Biochemistry and basic medicine), Pullman, WA
Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Exec. Director, Excel Centers, Professor Attendant, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO
Camilla R. G. Rees, MBA, Health Researcher, Author, “The Wireless Elephant in the Room”‘ CEO, Wide Angle Health, Sr. Policy Advisor, National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy, NY
Cindy Sage, MA, Sage Associates, Co-Editor, BioInitiative Reports, Santa Barbara, CA
Eugene Sobel, PhD, Professor (Retired), University of Southern California School of Medicine, CA
John G. West, MD, Director of Surgery, Breastlink, CA

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica