Extracted from the book “La enfermedad silenciada” by Raúl de la Rosa

According to the information gathered by Dr Lai in 2008 about the investigations in mobile telephony, the likelihood that a study finds no clear effect, is 2-3 times higher in industry-funded studies, whereas independent studies are twice as likely to find positive results about the effects of electromagnetic fields on the health.



William Rea MD

Founder and director of Center for Environmental Health, former President of Dallas, American Academy of Environmetal Medicine

Sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation is the emerging health problem of the XXI century. It is imperative that health professionals, governments, schools and parents learn more about this. Risks on human health are important”.


Martin Blank

Associate professor, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Investigator in Bioelectromagnetic, Author of the stress protein section of the Bioinitiative Research

“Cells of the body react to electromagnetic fields potencially harmful, just like other environmental toxins, included heavy metals toxic chemicals. DNA of living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at low level of exposure and produce a response to biochemical stress. Scientific proof tells us that our security standards are inadequate and we have to protect ourselves of the exposure to EMF due to power lines, mobile phones and similar, or risk the known consequences. Science is solid. We should seat down and pay attention”.

Olle Johansson, Ph. D.

Associate professor, Experimental Dermatology Unit , Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, Author of the BioInitiative Research section of Immune System

“It is clear that severeal biologic disorders , included the modulation of the immune system are present in electrohypersensitive people. We need to stop the widespread indifference and the lack of respect for the difficult situation of this people. It happened, and is still happening, something serious. All the aspects of electrohypersensitive people’s life are involved, including the working productively capacity in society, having healthy relations and finding a safe and permanent housing.

Basic elements of life are inaccessible for an increasing share of the world population. I heartly recommend all governments to take seriously electromagnetics risks on health, and to act while there is still time. Risk is still to high that communication technologies based in radio frequences present a potential damage for human, because of exponential growth, continuous and out of control. Governments must take vigorous action in order to protect public health, changing the exposure standards to have a biological base, communicating independent sciencie results on this subject, and investigating the relationship with a variety of medical conditions associated”.

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica

David Carpenter

MD professor Environmental Health Science and director, Health and Environment Institute, School of Public Health, University of Albany, co-editor of SUNY, the Bioinitiative Report ( )

“EMF are packets of energy that do not have mass and visible light is what we better know. X-rays are also EMF, but they are more energy than visible light, We are worry about those EMF that are less energy than visible light, included the ones assiciated to electricity and the ones used to communications and in microwaves. Fields associated to electricity are commonly called “extremely low frequency fields” (ELF). The ones used in communications and microwaves are called radio-frequency fields (RF). Studies in people have shown that the exposure to ELF and to RF increase the risk of cancer, and also that this occur at low intensities to cause heating in tissue. Unfortunately, all our exposure standards are based on the false assumption that harmful effects do not exist at intensities that do not heat issues. Many public health experts think it is possible to face an epidemic of cancers in the future, as a result of the uncontrolled use of mobile phones and a higher exposure to wifi and other wireless devices. It is important that, all of us, and especially children, restrict the use of mobile phones, limit the exposure to wifi and that government and industry discover ways to allow the use of wireless devices with no risk of developing a serious disease. We need to educate the decision-makers that continue “business as usual” is unacceptable. We cannot underestimate the importance of this public health problem”.

Magda Havas

Doctor, associated professor, Environmental and Resources Studies, Trent University, Canada

Expert in radio-frequency radiation, EMF, dirty electricity and ground current.

“Radio-frequency radiation and other forms of electromagnetic pollution are harmful in orders of magnitude well below existing patterns. Science is one of the tools society use to decide health policy. In the case of telecommunication equipment, like mobile phones, wireless networks, mobile phones antennas, PDA and portable telephones, science is being ignored. Current guidelines must be urgently re-examined by the government and reduced to reflect the state of the science. We look forward to a public health crisis and time is of the essence”.

Whitney North Seymour, Jr.

Esq. Retired lawyer, former New York Sate Senator, United States Attorney, co-founder New York Southern District, Natural Resources Defense Council

“Electromagnetic radiation is a serious human and environmental health problem, that needs immediate attention by Congress. BioInitiative Report is an important milestone in the underestanding of the risks on health of the wireless technology. Every responsible elected official owes the electorate learn and act about the findings and policy recommendations”.

B. Blake Levitt

New York Times former journalist and author of Electromagnetic Fields, Consumer Guideabout the problems and how to protect ourselves, editor of Cell Towers, wireless convenience? Or environmental danger?

EMF man-made, in a frequency range, are a seriuos environmental problem. However, most environmentalists know little about it, maybe because the topic has been competence of physicists and engineers for too long time, that biologists have lost contact with fundamental inclusion of electromagnetism in the biological paradigm. All living cells and living beings, regardless of gender or species, are electric dymanic consistent systems totally independent of bioelectricity for the most basic metabolic processes of the life. Most of living beings are fantastically sensitive to the little exposures to EMF. Living cells interpret this exposures as part of our normal cellular activities (heartbeats, brain waves, cell division…)

The problem is that man-made electromagnetic exposures are not “normal”. They are artificial devices with unusual intensities, signaling characteristics, pulsation patterns and waveforms, that do not exist in nature. They can turn off cells in so many ways. All the aspects of the ecosystem can be affected, included living species of animals, humans, plants and microorganisms in water and in the ground. We can currently see problems in sentinel groups like birds, bats and bees. Wildlife leave some areas when mobile phone towers are installed.

RF, the part of the electromagnetic spectrum used nowadays in everything wireless, is a well-known suppresive of the immune system. RF is a sort of air energy pollution and we should underestand it as such. Humans are not the only affected. Our planet’s health may be in dangerous. Citicens should ask the government to finance research and get the influence of the dialogue industry. Now we ignore this under our own risk.

Eric Braverman

MD Brain researcher, author of The Edge Effect and director of Path Medical in New York and the Path Foundation. Experto on the global brain impact in illness and health.

“There is no doubt that EMF have an important effect on nerve functioning. They slow down our brain waves and affect our long-term mental clarity. We should minimize, as much as possible, the exposures to optimize neurotransmitter levels and prevent deterioration of health”.

Abraham R. Liboff

PhD Research professor Center for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton Florida co-editor, Electromagnetic Biology and and Medicine

“The key point of electromagnetic pollution is public should realize that intensity should not be big for causing biological interaction.There is considerable evidence that extremely weak signals can have physiologic consequences. These interactive intensities are about 1000 times smaller than threshold values previously estimated by theorists, who in their vainglorius approach to science, rejected all the evidence for considering it inconsistent, according to their calculations. These faulty estimated thresholds must be corrected by regulators and media”.

The general problem with environmental electromagnetism is much deeper. Not only worry the power line frequencies, but also the frequency range covered by mophile phones. The continuous public exposure to electromagnetic radiation is related to money. The tens of thousand billion dolars of the mobile phone industry make mandatory, for corporate leaders, to deny, instinctively, any hint of danger. There may be hope for the future knowing that weakly strong electromagnetic interactions can be used both positive and negative. The fact that electromagnetic fields are biologically effective involve the probability of medical applications, what is happening now. As this occurs, we will be more aware of how our bodies react to electromagnetism and it should be clear, to all concerned, that there are reasons to be very careful with environmental electromagnetic fields.

Lennart Hardell

MD, PhD Professor at the University Hospital of Orebro, Sweden, world-renowned expert in mobile phones, wireless phones, brain tumors, wireless radio-frequency security and microwave radiation. Co-author of Dr. Hardell’s section of the BioInitiative on brain tumors

“The evidence for the risks of long-term use of mobile phones and wireless phones is pretty strong, when looking at people who has used these devices for 10 years or more, and when they are worn primarily on one side of the head. Recent studies that do not report an increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas have not analysed at regular users, the use for ten years or more, and do not look at the part of the brain that would reasonably be exposed to produce a tumor”.

Libby Kelley, MA
Managing Secretariat International Commission For Electromagnetic Safety; Founder, Council on Wireless Technology Impacts; Co-Producer of documentary, “Public Exposure: DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution”; EMF environmental consultant and leading appellant in challenging the FCC Radio Frequency Radiation human exposure guidelines, 1997-2000. (

“Radiofrequency radiation human exposure standards for personal wireless communications devices and for environmental exposure to wireless transmitters are set by national governments to guide the use of wireless communications devices and for wireless transmitters. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Communications Commission set these standards. The Council on Wireless Technology Impacts considers these exposure standards to be inadequate as they are based on heating effects and do not accommodate the low level, cumulative exposure conditions in which the public now lives. These standards are also designed for acute, short term exposure conditions and do not acknowledge the medical evidence pointing to increased risks and actual harm that results from chronic, intermittent exposure. Federal and State public heath agencies are not officially addressing what many concerned scientists and medical doctors now see as an emerging public health problem. There are no health surveillance or remedial response systems in place to advise citizens about electromagnetic radiation exposure (EMR). As wireless technology evolves, ambient background levels increase, creating electrical pollution conditions which are becoming ubiquitous and more invasive. We strongly encourage consumers, manufacturers, utility providers and policymakers to reduce, eliminate and mitigate EMR exposure conditions and to support biologically based standards.”

James S. Turner, Esq.
Chairman of the Board, Citizens for Health Co-author, Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life Attorney, Swankin-Turner, Washington, DC

“According to the BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields—from electrical and electronic appliances, power lines and wireless devices such as cell phones, cordless phones, cellular antennas, towers, and broadcast transmission towers—we live in an invisible fog of EMF which thirty years of science, including over 2,000 peer reviewed studies, shows exposes us to serious health risks such as increased Alzheimer’s disease, breast cancer, Lou Gehrig disease, EMF immune system hypersensitivity and disruption of brain function and DNA. The public needs to wake up politicians and public officials to the need for updating the decades old EMF public health standards. This report tells how.”

Camilla Rees, MBA

CEO, Wide Angle Health, LLC Patient education and advocacy

“The U.S. spends over $2 trillion dollars on health care each year, of which about 78% is from people with chronic illnesses, without adequately exploring and understanding what factors—including EMF/RF—contribute to imbalances in peoples’ bodies’ in the first place. After reading The BioInitiative Report, it should come as no surprise to policymakers, given the continually increasing levels of EMF/RF exposures in our environment, that close to 50% of Americans now live with a chronic illness. I grieve for people who needlessly suffer these illnesses and hold out the hope that our government leaders will become more cognizant of the role electromagnetic factors are playing in disease, health care costs and the erosion of quality of life and productivity in America.”

L. Lloyd Morgan, BS Electronic Engineering

Director Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Member Bioelectromagnetics Society, Member Brain Tumor Epidemiological Consortium *

“There is every indication that cell phones cause brain tumors, salivary gland tumors and eye cancer. Yet, because the cell phone industry provides a substantial proportion of research funding, this reality is hidden from the general public. The Interphone Study, a 13-country research project, substantially funded by the cell phone industry has consistently shown that use of a cell phone protects the user from risk of a brain tumor! Does anything more need to be said? It is time that fully independent studies be funded by those governmental agencies whose charter is to protect its citizens so that the truth about the very damaging health hazards of microwave radiation becomes clear and well known.”

*For identification purposes only: All statements are mine and mine alone and do not represent positions or opinions of the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, the Bioelectromagnetics Society or the Brain Tumor Epidemiological Consortia.

Janet Newton

President, The EMR Policy Institute

“The radiofrequency radiation safety policy in force in the United States fails to protect the public. Currently in the US there are more than 260 million wireless subscribers, the demand that drives the continuing build-out of antenna sites in residential and commercial neighborhoods, including near schools, daycare centers, and senior living centers and in the workplace. The January 2008 report issued by the National Academy of Sciences committee whose task was to examine the needs and gaps in the research on the biological effects of exposure to these antennas points out that the research studies to date do not adequately represent exposure realities. Specifically, the studies 1) assume a single antenna rather than the typical arrangements of a minimum of four to six antennas per site, thereby underestimating exposure intensities, 2) do not pertain to the commonly used multiple-element base station antennas, thereby not taking into account exposures to multiple frequencies, 3) lack models of several heights for men, women, and children of various ages for use in the characterization of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) distributions for exposures from cell phones, wireless PCs, and base stations and 4) do not take into consideration absorption effects of exposures from the many different radio frequency emitting devices to which the public is often simultaneously exposed. A federal research strategy to address these very serious inadequacies in the science on which our government is basing health policy is sorely needed now.”

Prof. Livio Giuliani, PhD

Spokesperson, International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (
Deputy Director, Italian National Institute for Worker Protection and Safety, East Venice and South Tyrol; Professor, School of Biochemistry of Camerino University, Italy

The Venice Resolution, initiated by the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) on June 6, 2008, and now signed by nearly 50 peer reviewed scientists worldwide, states in part, “We are compelled to confirm the existence of non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields on living matter, which seem to occur at every level of investigation from molecular to epidemiological. Recent epidemiological evidence is stronger than before. We recognize the growing public health problem known as electrohypersensitivity. We strongly advise limited use of cell phones, and other similar devices, by young children and teenagers, and we call upon governments to apply the Precautionary Principle as an interim measure while more biologically relevant exposure standards are developed.”

Professor Jacqueline McGlade

Executive Director, European Environmental Agency
Advisor to European Union countries under the European Commission

“There are many examples of the failure to use the precautionary principle in the past, which have resulted in serious and often irreversible damage to health and environments. Appropriate, precautionary and proportionate actions taken now to avoid plausible and potentially serious threats to health from EMF are likely to be seen as prudent and wise from future perspectives.”

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica

Paul J. Rosch, MD

Clinical Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry, New York Medical College; Honorary Vice President International Stress Management Association; Diplomate, National Board of Medical Examiners; Full Member, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences; Fellow, The Royal Society of Medicine; Emeritus Member, The Bioelectromagnetics Society

Claims that cell phones pose no health hazards are supported solely by Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits safety standards written by the telecommunications industry decades ago based on studies they funded. These have made the erroneous assumption that the only harm that could come from cell phone radiofrequency emissions would be from a thermal or heating action, since such non thermal fields can have no biological effects. The late Dr. Ross Adey disproved this three decades ago by demonstrating that very similar radiofrequency fields with certain carrier and modulation frequencies that had insufficient energy to produce any heating could cause the release of calcium ions from cells. Since then, numerous research reports have confirmed that non thermal fields from cell phones, tower transmitters, power lines, and other man made sources can significantly affect various tissues and physiologic functions.

We are constantly being bathed in an increasing sea of radiation from exposure to the above, as well as electrical appliances, computers, Bluetooth devices, Wi-Fi installations and over 2,000 communications satellites in outer space that shower us with signals to GPS receivers. New WiMax transmitters on cell phone towers that have a range of up to two square miles compared to Wi-Fi’s 300 feet will soon turn the core of North America into one huge electromagnetic hot spot. Children are more severely affected because their brains are developing and their skulls are thinner.

A two-minute call can alter brain function in a child for an hour, which is why other countries ban their sale or discourage their use under the age of 18. In contrast, this is the segment of the population now being targeted here in a $2 billion U.S. advertising campaign that views “tweens” (children between 8 and 12 years old) as the next big cell phone market. Firefly and Barbie cell phones are also being promoted for 6 to 8-year-olds.

It is not generally appreciated that there is a cumulative effect and that talking on a cell phone for just an hour a day for ten years can add up to 10,000 watts of radiation. That’s ten times more than from putting your head in a microwave oven. Pregnant women may also be at increased risk based on a study showing that children born to mothers who used a cell phone just two or three times a day during pregnancy showed a dramatic increase in hyperactivity and other behavioral and emotional problems. And for the 30% of children who had also used a cell phone by age 7, the incidence of behavioral problems was 80% higher! Whether ontogeny (embryonic development) recapitulates phylogeny is debatable, but it is clear that lower forms of life are also much more sensitive.

If you put the positive electrode of a 1.5 volt battery in the Pacific Ocean at San Francisco and the negative one off San Diego, sharks in the in between these cities can detect the few billionths of a volt electrical field. EMF fields have also been implicated in the recent massive but mysterious disappearance of honeybee colonies essential for pollinating over 90 commercial crops. As Albert Einstein warned, “If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe, then man would only have four years of life left.”

Finally, all life on earth evolved under the influence of solar radiation and geomagnetic forces that we have learned to adapt to and in some instances even utilize. The health of all living systems (ranging upward from a cell, tissue, organ or person, to a family, organization or nation) depends on good communication – good communication within, as well as with the external environment. All communication in the body eventually takes place via very subtle electromagnetic signaling between cells that is now being disrupted by artificial electropollution we have not had time to adapt to. As Alvin Toffler emphasized in Future Shock, too much change in too short a time produces severe stress due to adaptational failure. The adverse effects of electrosmog may take decades to be appreciated, although some, like carcinogenicity, are already starting to surface.

This gigantic experiment on our children and grandchildren could result in massive damage to mind and body with the potential to produce a disaster of unprecedented proportions, unless proper precautions are immediately implemented. At the same time, we must acknowledge that novel electromagnetic therapies have been shown to benefit stress related disorders ranging from anxiety, depression and insomnia, to arthritis, migraine and tension headaches. As demonstrated in Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, they may also be much safer and more effective than drugs, so we need to avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater.”

Samuel Milham MD, MPH
Médico epidemiólogo en epidemiología ocupacional. Primer científico en informar un aumento de la leucemia y otros cánceres en los trabajadores eléctricos y en demostrar que el pico de la edad infantil en la leucemia surgió junto con la propagación de la electrificación residencial.

“Very recently, new research is suggesting that nearly all the human plagues which emerged in the twentieth century, like common acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children, female breast cancer, malignant melanoma and asthma, can be tied to some facet of our use of electricity. There is an urgent need for governments and individuals to take steps to minimize community and personal EMF exposures.”


Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium

September 13, 2017

We, the undersigned, more than 180 scientists and doctor from 36 countries, recommend a moratorium on deployment of the fifth generation of telecommunications, 5G, until potential hazards to human health and environment have been investigated by independent industry scientists. 5G will dramatically increase the exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) od radio-frequency (RF) regard to the 2G, 3G, 4G, wifi, etc, already existing. The EMF of RF have demonstrated to be harmful to humans and environment.



5G technology is effective only at short distance. It is poorly transmitted through solid material. Many new antennas will be requiered and large-scale deployment will result in antennas every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas, thus massively increasing the mandatory exposure.

With the ever-increasing use of wireless technologies, no one can avoid exposure. Because it adds an increasing number of 5G transmitters (including within homes, businesses and hospitals) with an estimated 10 to 20 billion connections (fridges, washing machines, security cameras, automobiles and buses) that will be part of the “Internet of things”. All this factors can cause a substantial increase in total long-term exposure to European Union citizens.


Harmful effects of the exposure to EMF of RF are tested

More than 230 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their serious concerns regarding the omnipresent and growing exposure to EMF generated by electrical and wireless devices before the launch of 5G. They refer to the fact that numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affect living organisms at levels far below national and international guidelines.

Effects include increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased harmful free radicals, genetic damage, structural ans functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders and negative impacts on the general well-being of humans. The damages go beyond the human race, as there is increasing evidence of harmful effects to both animals and plants.

After the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015, additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks of the EMF of RF of wireless technology. The world’s largest study carried out by National Toxicology Programme (NTP) of the United States (25 million dollars), shows a statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart in animals exposed to EMF below ICNIRP (International Commission of non-ionizing Radiation Protection) criteria, followed by most countries. These results support the results in human epidemiological studies of radiofrequency radiation and brain tumor risk. A large number of peer-reviwed scientific papers demonstrate harm to human health because of EMF.

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), concluded that EMF of frequencies from 30 Khz to 300 Ghz are possibly carcinogenic to human (Group 2B). However, new studies such as the NTP study previously mentioned and several epidemiologic investigations, including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks, confirm that EMF of RF radiation is carcinogenic for human beings. The 2016 EUROPAEM Guide on EMF stablishes that exist strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMF is a risk factor for diseases such as certain types of cancer, Alzheimer, male infertility…Commom symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitive (EHS) include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue and flu-like symptoms.

A growing proportion of the European population is affected by health problems that for many years have been related to the exposure to EMF and wireless radiation in the scientific literature.

The International Scientific Statement on EHS and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), Brussels 2015, declares that: Based on our current scientifc knowledge, in this way, we insist on all national and international organizations and institutions, in particular the World Health Organization (WHO), to recognize EHS and MCS as true medical conditions, which, acting as sentinel diseases, may create a major public health poblem in the coming years throughout the world, that is to say, in all countries that apply the unlimited use of technologies based on wireless EMF commercialised chemical substances…

Inaction is a cost to society and cannot go on being an option… We unanimouslyrecognize this serious danger to public health that urgently requires the recognition of this condition at all international levels… and, above all, that important primary prevention measures be adopted and priorized to face this global pan-epidemic in perspective.


The Precautionary Principle (UNESCO) was adopted by the European Unions in 2005: “When human activities can lead into a morally unacceptable danger, scientifically possible but uncertain, measures must be taken to avoid or decrease that danger”. Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): “Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to EMF, especially to radio frequencies emitted by mobile phones, and in particular the exposure in children and youth, for whom the risk of head tumors appears to be higher… The Assembly recommended the application of the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable), that is, the level as low as reasonably possible, taking into account not only the thermal effects, but aslo the athermal (non-thermal) or biological effects of the emission or radiation of EMF” and “improve the risk evaluation criteria and the quality of the assessment by creating a standard risk scale”. The Nuremberg Medical Code of Ethics (1949) applies to experiments on human beings, thus it includes the deployment of 5G with the new exposure to EMF of RF.

All these experiments must be designed and based “on the results obtained through previous experimentation with animals and the full knowledge of the natural history of the disease or problem under study, so that the anticipated results justify the experiment (…) No experiment should be performed when there is a priori reason to suppose that death or irreparable injury can occur, except, perhaps, in experiments in which medical researchers are also experiment subjects” (Nuremberg Code points 3 and 5). Published scientific studies show that there is “a priori reason to suppose” real health risks. The European Environment Agency (EEA) is warning about “the risk of radiation from everyday devices”, despite radiation bein below WHO/ ICNIRP standards. The EEA also concludes: “There are numerous examples in the past that, because of not using the precautionary principle, led to serious, and often irreversible, damage to health and environment… Harmful exposures could be spread before there is “categorical” evidence from long-term exposures, as well as a biological underestanding (mechanism) of the harm they can cause”.

“Safety Guidelines” protect industry, not health

The current ICNIRP “safety guidelines” are outdated. All the evidence of damage, mentioned above, arises even if the radiation falls below these ICNIRP “safety guidelines”. Therefore, new safety regulations are necessary. The reason of the deceitful guidelines is that “the conflict of interests of ICNIRP members, due to their relationships with the telecommunications or electricity industries, undermine the impartiality that the regulation of the Public Exposure Standards should govern for non-ionizing radiation… To evaluate cancer risks it is necessary to include scientists with competence in medicine, especially in oncology”.

The current ICNIRP/ WHO guidelines for EMF are based on the outdated hypothesis that “the fundamental effect os exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields of relevance to human health and safety is the heating of exposed tissue”. However, scientists have shown that many different types of illnesses and harmful effects occur without heating (non-thermal effect) at radiation levels well below ICNIRP guidelines.

We urge the European Union:

1) Take all reasonable measures to stop the expansion of the radio-frequency electromagnetic fields of the 5G until independent scientits can ensure that 5G and the total radiation levels caused by RF EMF (5G together with 2G, , 3G, 4G and wifi) will not be harmful to the European Union citizens, especially babies, children and pregnant women, as well as to the environment.

2) Recommend that all EU countries, especially their radiation safety agencies, folow Resolution 1815 and inform citizens, including medical and educational professionals, about the health risks arising from radiation of the RF EMF, how and why to avoid wireless communication, particularly in/ near nurseries, schools, homes, workplaces, hospitals and senior centers.

3) Appoint immediately, without industry influence, a European Union EMF and health working group of independent and truly impartial scientists, without conflicts of interests, to reassess health risks and:

a) Decide on new safe “maximun total exposure standards” for all wireless communications within the EU.

b) Study the total and cumulative exposure that affects EU citizenship.

c) Create standards that are required and applied in the EU on how to avoid a exposure that exceeds the new EU “maximum total exposure standards” related to all kind of EMF to protect citizenship, especially babies, children and pregnant women.

4) Prevent the wireless and telecommunications industry, through their lobbying organizations, from persuading European officials to make decisions about encouraging the propagation of RF, including 5G in Europe.

5) Favour and implement wired digital telecommunications instead of wireless.

We expect a response from you, at the latest on 31 October 2017, to the first two signatories on what measures they will take to protect EU inhabitants against RF EMF and especially 5G radiation. This appeal and its response will be available to the public.

Respectfully presented

Rainer Nyberg, EdD, Professor Emeritus (Åbo Akademi), Vasa, Finland (
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor (assoc) Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden (

Signatories to Scientists’ 5G Appeal

Note: The endorsements are personal and not necessarily supported by the affiliated universities or organizations.

EU and European Nations

Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Public Health Officer, Salzburg

Marie-Claire Cammaerts, Dr, retired, Free University of Brussels, Bruxelles

Marko Markov, Professor Emeritus, Ph.D. in biophysics, Sofia University, Research international

Stella Canna Michaelidou, Dr, Chemist Expert on Environment, Health and Food Safety, President of the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health

Marjukka Hagström, LL.M, M.Soc.Sc., Senior researcher, The Finnish Electrosensitivity Foundation, Turku
Osmo Hänninen, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland; Editor-In-Chief, Pathophysiology, Kuopio Georgiy Ostroumov, PhD (in the field of RF EMF), independent researcher

Marc Arazi, MD, Physician (Whistleblower on Phonegate international scandal), Nogent-sur-Marne
Dominique Belpomme, MD, MSc, Full Professor in Medical Oncology; Director of ECERI, Paris University, Paris & European Cancer and Environment Research Institute, Brussels
Philippe Irigaray, PhD, Scientific Director, Association for Research on Treatment against Cancer (ARTAC), Paris; European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (ECERI), Brussels
Vincent Lauer, Ing. ECP, Independent Researcher, La Chapelle sur Erdre
Annie J Sasco, MD, DrPH, Former Director of Research, French National Institute of Health
and Medical Research, Former Chief of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the International Agency for Research on Cancer and Former Acting Chief of Program for Cancer Control, World Health Organization, Bordeaux

Franz Adlkofer, MD, Professor, Pandora-Foundation for Independent Research
Christine Aschermann, MD (retired) member of the Kompetenzinitiative e.V., Leutkirch Mario Babilon, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University Stuttgart
Wolf Bergmann, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Freiburg
Rainer Frentzel-Beyme, MD, Professor emeritus, University of Bremen.
Helmut Breunig, Diploma degree in forestry, Specialty: Radio frequency injuries on trees around phone masts, Osterode am Harz
Klaus Buchner, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, MEP – Member of the European Parliament, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., München
Horst Eger, Dr. med., Ärztlicher Qualitätszirkel ”Elektromagnetische Felder in der Medizin – Diagnostik, Therapie, Umwelt”, Naila
Karl Hecht, Dr, Professor of pathophysiology and neurophysiology (Emeritus of the Medical center Charite), Berlin
Peter Hensinger, MA, diagnose:funk, consumer protection organisation, Stuttgart
Markus Kern, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Kempten
Florian M. König, Dr.Sc. Man. Dir. & Science Header of the Company/Institute “Florian König Enterprises GmbH”
Andrea Leute, Dr. med., Ärzteinitiative Mobilfunk Allgäu-Bodensee-Oberschwaben, Überlingen
Martin Lion, Dr. med., Allgemeinmedizin – Homöopathie, Ulm
Joachim Mutter, Dr. med., Paracelsus Clinic / Switzerland, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Murg
Gertraud Teuchert-Noodt, Dr., Professorin der Neurobiologie i.R., Universität Bielefeld
Peter Ohnsorge, Dr. med., European Academy for Environmental Medicine
Karl Richter, Dr. phil., Professor, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., St. Ingbert
Claus Scheingraber, Dr. med. dent., German Working Group Electro-Biology, Brunnthal,
Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam,, Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy e.V., Bamberg
Werner Thiede, Dr. theol., Professor, Pfarrer der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Landeskirche in Bayern und Publizist, Neuhausen
Helmut Wagner, Dr. med., Ophthalmologist, Stuttgart
Harald Walach, Professor, PhD in psychology, PhD in theory and history of science, Change Health Science Institute, Berlin; affiliation: Witten-Herdecke University, Poznan Medical University, Poland
Ulrich Warnke, Dr.rer.nat., Academic Superior Council (retired) University of Saarland
Isabel Wilke, Diplom-Biologin, Editor ElektrosmogReport, Kassel/Berlin
Roland Wolff, Dipl.-Phys., Medical Physicist, Bremen
Ortwin Zais, PhD (Dr. med.), European Academy for Environmental Medicine

Christos Georgiou, PhD, Member, Scientific Secretariat of ICEMS; Professor of Biochemistry, Biology Department, University of Patras, Patras
Theodore P. Metsis, PhD, Electrical, Mechanical, Environmental Engineer, Consultant, Athens

Domenico Agrusta, Medicine and surgery, specialist in dentistry (Odontostomatologia) self- employed, Member of ISDE, Taranto
Fernanda Amicarelli, Full Professor in Applied Biology, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila
Fiorella Belpoggi, Dr., Director, Research Department, Ramazzini Institute, Bologna
Sergio Bernasconi, Full Professor of Pediatrics, former Director, Pediatric Department, Editor emeritus: Italian Journal of Pediatrics, University of Parma
Dr Franco Berrino, MD, PhD, former Director, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Istitutonazionale dei Tumori, Milan
Ernesto Burgio, MD, Pediatrician, ECERI – European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (Bruxelles)
Dr Franco Cherubini, Degree in medicine and surgery, Self-employed, Vetralla
Dott. Agostino Di Ciaula, President of Scientific Committee, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE Italy, Arezzo
Dott. Andrea Cormano, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Benevento Ugo Corrieri, Degree in medicine and surgery at Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Teacher at Scuola Romana di Psicoterapia Familiare, President of ISDE-Doctors for the Environment in Grosseto, Coordinator of ISDE-Doctors for the Environment for Central Italy, Grosseto- Rome
Dr Patrizia Difonte, Physician, Surgeon, General practitioner and occupational medicine, Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili, Lonate Pozzolo (Varese)
Anna Maria Falasconi, Medical Doctor, Primary Care Pediatrician, National Health System, Rome
Dott. Filippo Maria di Fava, Laurea in Medicina e Chirurgia, Libero professionista, Roma
Dr. Mario Frusi, MD, medico, Cuneo Dr. Stefano Gallozzi, Astrophysician and technologist at the INAF Italian National Astrophysical Institute in the Observatory, President of the Comitato di Tutela e Salvaguardia dell’Ambiente in Monte Porzio Catone (ONLUS association), Rome
Dott. Roberto Gava, Pharmacologist and Toxicologist, ISDE, Padua
Teresa Pia Anna Maria Del Gaudio, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, specialist in pediatrics, Medical Manager, ASL Salerno, Roccagloriosa (SA), Italy
Valerio Gennaro, MD, PhD, Head ,Liguria Mesothelioma Registry (COR Liguria), UO Clinical Epidemiology (IST Nord – CBA); IRCCS Policlinico Ospedale San Martino National Cancer Research Institute (IST), Genoa
Patrizia Gentilini, Degree in Medicine (specialization in Oncology and Hematology). ISDE (International Society Doctor’s for Environment), FORLI’
Livio Giuliani, PhD, Professor, Università dell’Abruzzo – Corso di Laurea in Fisiatria, Chieti Angelo Levis, PhD. Professor, Biologist, University of Padua Roberto Lucchini, MD, Professor of Occupational Medicine, University of Brescia
Fiorenzo Marinelli, PhD, Institute of Molecular Genetics (IGM), National Research Council (CNR), Member of the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), Bologna,
Antonio Maria Pasciuto, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, Specialist in Internal Medicine, President of ASSIMAS (Associazione Italiana Medicina Ambiente e Salute), Rome
Dott. Carlo Ratti, MD, Ordine dei Medici della SPEZIA, Genova
Ruggero Ridolfi, MD, Oncologist Endocrinologist, ISDE, Forlì-Cesena
Dr. Med. Sandro Rinaldi, Laurea in medicina e chirurgia; specializzazione in Allergologia; specializzazione in Ematologia. Medico di medicina generale convenzionato con l’Azienda Sanitaria di Bolzano, Terlano (BZ)
Massimo Melelli Roia, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Perugia
Dott. Roberto Romizi, President, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Arezzo
Dott.ssa Ida Santellocco, MD, Medico chirurgo, Pediatria, medico chirurgo – pediatra, Roma
Massimo Scalia, Coordinator of the Bioelectromagnetism Section of CIRPS (Interuniversity Research Center for Sustainable Development)
Alessandro Solerio, Degree in Medicine and Surgery, Self-employed, homeopath, Sanremo
Franco Verzella, MD, physician, practice dedicated to autistic children, Bologna,
Myriam Zucca, Dr. ssa, Medical Director, Dermatology, Cagliari University Hospital, Sardinia

Pierre Mallia, MD PhD CBiol MPhil MA(Law) DipICGP MMCFD MRCP FRCGP, Professor of Family Medicine, Bioethics & Patients’ Rights; Chairperson National Health Ethics Committee, Dept. of Health Coordinator Bioethics Research Programme, Univ. of Malta; President, Malta College of Family Doctors

Hugo Schooneveld, PhD, Retired Associate professor (Wageningen Agricultural University), Advisor to the Dutch EHS Foundation, former president of ‘Stichting elektro- hypersensitivity’, Wageningen

Paulo Vale, PhD, Auxiliary Researcher, Sea and Marine Resources Department, The Portuguese Sea and Atmosphere Institute, Lisbon

Igor Belyaev, PhD, Dr.Sc, Associate Professor, Cancer Research Institute, BMC SAS, Bratislava Jan Jakus, MD, PhD, DSc. Professor, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin
Ladislav Janousek, PhD, Professor, Department of Electromagnetic and Biomedical Engineering
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Zilina, Žilina
Michal Teplan, PhD, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak academy of sciences, Bratislava

Alfonso Balmori, BSc, Master in Environmental Education, Biologist. Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid José Luis Bardasano, PhD, Biologist and Physician, Prof. of Medical Bioelectomagnetism, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Pilar Muñoz-Calero, MD, President of the Fundación Alborada, Co-director of the Chair of Pathology and Environment, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid Miguel Lopez-Lazaro, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville
María Elena López Martín, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) Enrique A. Navarro, PhD, Professor, University of Valencia, Valencia
Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Chief of Section, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia
Ceferino Maestu Unturbe, Ph.D, Prof., Director of the Bioelectromagnetism Laboratory of the Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM).

Mikko Ahonen, PhD, researcher, Sundsvall
Michael Carlberg, MSc, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro
Mikael Eriksson, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Skane University, Hospital, Lund
Lena Hedendahl, MD, Independent Environment and Health Research, Luleå Olle Johansson, Associate Professor, Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm
Gunilla Ladberg, PhD, Member of the Board of the Swedish association Vågbrytaren, Lidingö
Leif G. Salford, MD, PhD, Senior Professor of Neurosurgery, Director of the Rausing Laboratory for Translational NeuroOncology, Lund University, Lund
Elsy-Britt Schildt, MD, PhD, Senior Consultant, Department of Oncology and Radiation, County Hospital, Kalmar
Fredrik Söderqvist, PhD, Epidemiologist, Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Västerås

Daniel Favre, Dr. phil., Biologist, Independent Researcher, Brent
Peter Meier, Dr.Med. Facharzt für Innere Medizin FMH, M.Sc. Präventivmedizin, Mitglied der European Academy for Environmental Medicine, Sissach

Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD, BMBS, Founder of PHIRE (Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment) Trustee Radiation Research Trust, Medical Advisor ORSAA (Oceana Radiofrequency Advisory Association), Medical Advisor ES-UK, Soton
David Gee, Visiting Fellow, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London
Andrew Goldsworthy, BSc, PhD, Lecturer in Biology (retired), Imperial College London, Monmouth
Alasdair Philips, BSc, DAgE, Professional engineer, Powerwatch
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, MBBS, MA, MSc, PhD , Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Occupational Health, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Trust; Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University, London
Sarah Starkey, PhD, Independent Neuroscience and Environmental Health Research
Andrew Tresidder, MD, MBBS, MRCGP, Somerset GP

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica

Other Nations

Sinerik Ayrapetyan, PhD, Professor, Life Sciences International Postgraduate Educational Center, UNESCO Chair in Life Sciences, Yerevan, Head of Research Council and Chairholder of UNESCO Chair

Priyanka Bandara, PhD, Environmental Health Consultant, Castle Hill/Sydney, NSW
Katherine Georgouras, OAM, DDM, FACD, Professor of Dermatology, (semiretired) ,Kenthurst NSW
Ray Kearney OAM, PhD, Honorary Assoc. Professor (retired), Department of Medicine, University of Sydney
Don Maisch, PhD, Independent researcher, author of ”The Procrustean Approach”, Lindisfarne, Tasmania
May Murray, PhD, Independent Environmental Health researcher, Canberra
Elena Pirogova, PhD, Associate Professor, Biomed Eng, BEng (Hons) Chem En, Discipline of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University
Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 9
Charles Teo, AM, MBBS, Professor, Neurosurgeon, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Sydney
Steve Weller, BSc, Founding member of ORSSA, Brisbane

Orlando Furtado Vieira Filho, PhD, Professor, Cellular & Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Claudio Enrique Fernández-Rodríguez, PhD, MSEE, Professor, Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, IFRS, Canoas
Alvaro Augusto A. de Salles, PhD, Full Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre
Francisco de Assis Ferreira Tejo (retired) D.Sc., Professor, Grupo de Eletromagnetismo Computacional e Bioeletromagnetismo, Electrical Engineering Dept, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Frank Clegg, CEO, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST); Former President of Microsoft Canada
Paul Héroux, PhD, Occupational Health Program Director, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Medicine, Montreal, PQ
Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP, Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto,
Malcolm Paterson, PhD, Director, Research Initiatives, BC Cancer Agency Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC
Michael A. Persinger, PhD, Professor, Biomolecular Sciences, Behavioural Neuroscience and Human Studies, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario
Magda Havas, Associate Professor, Trent University, Canada

Wenjun Sun, PhD, Professor, Bioelectromagnetics Key Laboratory, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou
Minglian Wang, M.M. , PhD, Associate Professor, College of Life Science & Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology (BJUT), Beijing

Carlos Sosa, MD, University of Antioquia, Medellín

Nasr Radwan, Prof. Dr., Cairo University, Faculty of Science, Cairo

Ganesh Chandra Jagetia, Professor, Just retired from Department of Zoology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Udaipur Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical & Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
R. S. Sharma, PhD, Head, Scientist – G & Sr. DDG, Div. of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health and Chief Project Coordinator – EMF Health Project India, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi

Amirnader Emami Razavi, PhD, Executive Manager and Principal Investigator of Iran, National Tumor Bank, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Dr. Masood Sepehrimanesh, PhD, Assistant Professor, Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center, Guilan Universtiy of Medical Sciences, Rasht

Iris Atzmon, MPH, Epidemiology, University of Haifa, Author of ”The Cellular, not what you thought!”, Haifa
Michael Peleg, M.Sc., Radio Communications Engineer and Researcher, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
Elihu D Richter, MD MPH, Professor, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem
Yael Stein, MD, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem
Danny Wolf, MD, Pediatrician, Clialit Health Services Raziel, Netanya Herzelia

Hidetake Miyata, PhD, Associate professor, Department of Physics. Tohoku University

Mohammed Saleh Al Salameh, PhD, Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science & Technology, Irbid

KOREA (South)
Kiwon Song, PhD, Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul
Young Hwan Ahn, MD PhD, Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou Univeristy School of Medicine, Suwon

Damian Wojcik, MD, MBChB, Medical director/ Northland Environmental health Clinic, Whangare, Northland

Aneyo Idowu Ayisat, M.Sc., Lecturer, Environmental Biology Unit, Biological Science Department,
Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos

Dr Najam Siddiqi, MBBS, PhD, Associate Professor of Anatomy, Oman Medical College, Sohar

Yury Grigoriev, Professor, M. Dr Sci., Federal. Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow
Maxim V. Trushin, PhD, Associate Professor, Kazan Federal University, Kazan

Osman Cerezci, Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University, Adapazarı
Suleyman Dasdag, PhD, Prof. Dr., Biophysics Department, Medical School, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Uskudar, Istanbul
Onur Elmas, MD, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Of Physiology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla
Ayse Inhan Garip, Assoc. Prof., School of Medicine, Biophysics Dept., Marmara Univ., Istanbul
Suleyman Kaplan, PhD, Professor, President of Turkish Society for Stereology, Board member of Journal Chemical Neuroanatomy (Elsevier), Board member of Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure (Elsevier), Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun
Fulya Kunter, Assistant Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul
Selim Şeker, Professor Dr., Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Bogazici University
Nesrin Seyhan, Prof. Dr., Gazi University Medical Faculty, Founder Head, Biophysics Department; Founding Director, Gazi Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Centre (GNRK), Ankara

Olexandr Tsybulin, PhD, Department of Biophysics, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
Igor Yakymenko, Prof. Dr, Department of Biochemistry and Environmental Control
National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv
USA David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, A Collaborating Centre of the World Health Organization, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY
Barry Castleman, ScD, Environmental Consultant, Garrett Park, MD
Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Visiting Prof. Medicine, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center & Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School (Turkey); Pres., Environmental Health Trust, Teton Village, WY
Paul Doyon, MA, MAT, EMRS, Independent Researcher, Doyon Independent Research, CA
Arthur Firstenberg, B.A., EMF researcher and author, president Cellular Phone Task Force, New York
Beatrice A. Golomb, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
Peter F. Infante, DrPH, Managing Member, Peter F. Infante Consulting, LLC, VA
Toril H. Jelter, MD, MDI Wellness Center, CA
Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Tucson, AZ
Henry Lai, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
B. Blake Levitt, medical/science journalist, former New York Times contributor, EMF researcher and author
Trevor G Marshall, ME, PhD, Director, Autoimmunity Research Foundation, CA
Ronald Melnick, PhD, Senior Toxicologist, (Retired RF-section leader) US National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
L. Lloyd Morgan, Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Health Trust, Board Member, International EMF Alliance (IEMFA), CA
S. M. J. Mortazavi, PhD, Professor of Medical Physics, Visiting Scientist, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Martin Pall, BA, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Biochemistry and basic medicine), Pullman, WA
Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Exec. Director, Excel Centers, Professor Attendant, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO
Camilla R. G. Rees, MBA, Health Researcher, Author,”The Wireless Elephant in the Room”’ CEO, Wide Angle Health, Sr. Policy Advisor, National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy, NY
Cindy Sage, MA, Sage Associates, Co-Editor, BioInitiative Reports, Santa Barbara, CA
Eugene Sobel, PhD, Professor (Retired), University of Southern California School of Medicine, CA
John G. West, MD, Director of Surgery, Breastlink, CA

Bhital · Salud Ambiental & Medicina Biológica