Listado de la etiqueta: electrohypersensitivity

Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.

Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Impact of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on DNA and voltage-gated channels.

Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF), such as those emitted by mobile phones, Wi-Fi, power grids, and other everyday devices, can affect both DNA and voltage-gated ion channels (VGCCs, Nav, Kv, etc.) in cell membranes. While EMF do not have enough energy to directly damage DNA, as ionizing radiation does, they can induce indirect effects that alter cellular function, primarily through oxidative stress, changes in gene expression, and dysfunction of ion channels.

Mechanisms of DNA Damage

Non-ionising EMFs can generate oxidative stress, a key mechanism for indirect DNA damage. This oxidative stress increases the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage DNA bases and the sugar-phosphate chain, which can result in mutations and breaks in the DNA double helix. A common marker for this type of damage is 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). In addition, prolonged exposure to EMF can compromise DNA repair mechanisms, increasing the accumulation of genetic errors. Additionally, EMF may alter the expression of genes related to DNA repair, apoptosis (cell death) and cellular detoxification, reducing the body’s ability to repair damage and maintain genetic stability.

 

Electrohypersensitivity

Effects on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels

Voltage-gated ion channels are membrane proteins that allow ions to pass through the membrane in response to changes in electrical voltage. These channels are essential for the proper functioning of excitable cells, such as neurons and muscle cells. Exposure to non-ionizing EMF can alter the function of these channels, causing cellular dysfunction and generating various clinical symptoms.

1.Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels (VGCCs)

VGCCs regulate the flow of calcium through cell membranes. Exposure to EMF can activate these channels, allowing an increased influx of intracellular calcium, which leads to several harmful effects:

  • ROS Production: Excess calcium activates enzymes such as NADPH oxidase, which generates ROS, causing oxidative stress and cellular damage.
  • Inflammation: Excess intracellular calcium can trigger the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-alpha, promoting a chronic inflammatory response.
  • Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Excess calcium affects the mitochondria, disrupting energy production and generating more ROS, which contributes to cellular aging

2. Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels (Nav)

Sodium channels are essential for the generation and propagation of action potentials in excitable cells. Exposure to EMF can disrupt their function, affecting neuronal excitability and leading to symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, or sensory disturbances.

3. Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels (Kv)

Potassium channels are crucial for cellular repolarization after an action potential. Dysfunction of these channels, caused by EMF exposure, can lead to hyperexcitability or disruptions in heart rhythm, such as palpitations or arrhythmias.

4. Voltage-Gated Chloride Channels

Chloride channels regulate membrane potential and cell volume. Their dysfunction can affect membrane voltage stability and lead to neuromuscular and sensory symptoms.

Bhital Environmental Health & Biological Medicine

Diagram: Mechanisms linked to exposure to non-ionising EMFs

 

This diagram, drawn by Dr. Richard Gautier, illustrates the possible effects of exposure to non-ionising Electromagnetic Fields (EMF). The effects of these mechanisms can manifest themselves as, among others, the following:

  • Headaches (cephalalalgias)
  • Sleep disorders and fatigue
  • Cognitive disorders
  • Brain tumours
  • Neurodegenerative diseases
  • Cancer and leukaemia

The diagram also details how EMFs can alter the permeability of blood-brain and blood-blood barriers, as well as affect melatonin synthesis and immunity in lymphocytes, which could explain their link to chronic and neurodegenerative diseases.

 

Clinical consequences

1. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

Excessive activation of voltage-dependent calcium channels causes an increase in ROS and inflammatory cytokines, leading to chronic inflammation and cell damage.

2. Neurological disturbance

Dysfunction of sodium and calcium channels affects neuronal excitability, causing headaches, cognitive problems and sleep disturbances.

3. Cardiovascular problems

Potassium channel dysfunction alters cardiac repolarisation, leading to palpitations and arrhythmias in sensitive individuals.

4. Muscle Disorders

Changes in ion channels can alter muscle function, causing muscle spasm, fatigue and weakness.

environmental

Scientific evidence

  1. Martin Pall and VGCCs: Dr. Martin Pall proposed that non-ionising EMFs affect VGCCs, increasing intracellular calcium entry and triggering a cascade of oxidative stress and cell damage.
    • Reference: Pall, M. L. (2013). Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 17(8), 958-965. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12088.
  2. EMF oxidative stress: Exposure to non-ionising EMF can induce the production of ROS, leading to oxidative stress and DNA damage.
    • Reference: Belpomme, D., Hardell, L., Belyaev, I., Burgio, E., & Carpenter, D. O. (2018). Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environmental Pollution, 242, 643-658. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019.
  3. Neurological effects and EMF: EMF can alter neuronal function, causing symptoms such as fatigue, headaches and cognitive problems.
    • Reference: Belyaev, I., Markova, E., Hillert, L., Malmgren, L. O., & Persson, B. R. (2009). Microwaves from mobile phones inhibit 53BP1 focus formation in human stem cells more strongly than in differentiated cells: Possible mechanistic link to cancer risk. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(6), 870-876. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0800465.
  4. EMF-induced inflammation: EMF can induce inflammatory responses by activating calcium channels and producing ROS.
    • Reference: Yakymenko, I., Sidorik, E., Kyrylenko, S., & Chekhun, V. (2011). Long-term exposure to microwave radiation provokes cancer growth: Evidences from radars and mobile communication systems. Experimental Oncology, 33(2), 62-70.

 

Conclusion

Exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields (EMF) can have harmful effects on health by altering voltage-dependent ion channels, particularly VGCCs. These alterations can generate excess intracellular calcium, triggering a cascade of harmful biological events such as oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and a range of neurological, cardiovascular and muscular consequences. Although EMFs do not cause direct DNA damage, the cumulative effects of prolonged exposure can compromise DNA repair mechanisms and alter gene expression, which may increase the risk of chronic, neurodegenerative diseases and even cancer

Health impacts include cognitive problems, sleep disorders, headaches, and even more serious conditions such as cardiac arrhythmias, muscle weakness and neurological disorders. Reducing oxidative stress, inflammation and improving the body’s detoxification systems are essential steps to mitigate the negative effects of exposure to non-ionising EMFs. Taking preventive measures to reduce exposure and improve the body’s antioxidant defences is key to creating a healthier environment and prolonging quality of life.

Take action

If you are concerned about the potential effects of exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields on your health, it is important to take proactive measures. Through a holistic medical approach, you can reduce the negative effects of oxidative stress, inflammation and enhance detoxification mechanisms to protect yourself and optimise your well-being. In addition, a personalised analysis of your environment can help reduce exposure to these non-ionising EMFs, contributing to a healthier environment at both the cellular and environmental levels.

Request a medical appointment today to create a personalised action plan that addresses these key factors and improves your overall health. You can get in touch via WhatsApp on 669 979 939 and request an environmental health medical visit. Together, we will work to:

  • Decrease oxidative stress in your body,
  • Reducing chronic inflammation ,
  • Optimise your detoxification systems,
  • Assess your environment and reduce exposure to non-ionising EMFs.

It’s time to take control of your health and create a healthier environment for you and your family – I’m here to help!

Electrohypersensitivity

I want to share with you this article based on information provided by EFEIA, which explains in detail what electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is.

This health problem, increasingly common worldwide, remains difficult for most healthcare workers to understand. It is essential to shed light on this condition in order to improve understanding and support for people with the condition.

Electrohypersensitivity: a look at electromagnetic field sensitivity

Electrohypersensitivity (EHS), also known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity, is an increasingly recognised condition affecting people who experience sensitivity or allergy to electromagnetic fields (EMF). This sensitivity manifests itself through a variety of symptoms, from mild to extremely severe, which can worsen pre-existing health conditions.

environmental

What is electrohypersensitivity?

Electrohypersensitivity is a condition in which individuals exhibit adverse reactions to electromagnetic fields, even at levels well below the maximum permitted by international radiation safety standards. EHS sufferers report a range of health problems that they attribute to EMF exposure. These symptoms can be so debilitating that some people are forced to radically change their lifestyle, avoiding EMFs as much as possible and even stopping work.

Common symptoms

Symptoms of EHS vary considerably between individuals, but the most common include:

  • Dermatological: Redness, tingling and burning sensation of the skin.
  • Neurological: Headaches, dizziness, nausea, difficulty concentrating, memory loss, irritability, depression, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, tremors and muscle spasms.
  • Cardiac: palpitations, arrhythmias, chest pain or pressure and fluctuating blood pressure.
  • Hearing: squeaking, buzzing or hearing loss.
  • Respiratory: Sinusitis, bronchitis, pneumonia and asthma.
  • Ophthalmological: Pain or burning in the eyes, deterioration of vision and cataracts.
  • Other: Digestive problems, abdominal pain, sexual dysfunction, dry mouth and eyes, and nosebleeds.

Electrohypersensitivity

Recognition and protection

In some countries, EHS has been recognised as a functional impairment. A notable example is Sweden, where this condition is considered a functional disability, giving those affected maximum legal protection and financial support. This protection includes free accessibility measures, government subsidies and the possibility of forming disability organisations.

Bhital. International resolutions

Initiatives and studies

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has taken steps to understand and address EHS. In October 2004, it organised a seminar in Prague together with the National Reference Laboratory for Non-Ionising Radiation and the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. This event brought together experts to review the current state of knowledge on EHS and provide useful information for those affected.

In addition, EFEIA is actively working on data collection through a Global EHS Census. This effort aims to shed light on the prevalence and effects of EHS, as well as to find practical solutions for those affected.

The role of Dr. Olle Johansson

One of the leading advocates for the recognition of EHS is Dr. Olle Johansson, a world leading authority in the field of EMF radiation and its health effects. Dr Johansson coined the term «screen dermatitis» and has been instrumental in the recognition of EHS as a functional disorder. Their work has been crucial in getting electrohypersensitive people the recognition and protection they need.

Conclusion

Electrohypersensitivity is a real and debilitating condition for many people around the world. Although more research is still needed to fully understand its mechanisms and effects, recognition and protection of those affected are crucial steps towards a more inclusive and equitable society. It is essential that health institutions, governments and communities work together to provide the necessary support and improve the quality of life of those suffering from this condition.

If you are a person with EHS and need help, you can ask for a free counselling appointment with me on WhatsApp 669 979 939.

 

 

 

Scientific articles on electrohypersensitivity

World Health Organisation (WHO)

  • Electromagnetic fields and public health: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. WHO Factsheet 296, 2005.

Studies and systematic reviews

  • Rubin, James; Das Munshi, J.; Wessely, Simon (Marzo-Abril 2005). «Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies». Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(2), pp. 224-232. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64. PMID 15784787.
  • Röösli, M. (Junio 2008). «Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review». Environmental Research, 107(2), pp. 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003. PMID 18359015.

International conferences and workshops

  • Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Proceedings. International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity, Praga, República Checa, Octubre 25-27, 2004.

Surveys and population-based studies

  • Roosli, Martin; Moser, M.; Baldinini, Y.; Meier, M.; Braun-Fahrlander, C. (Febrero 2004). «Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure – a questionnaire survey». International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 207(2), pp. 141-150. doi:10.1078/1438-4639-00269. PMID 15031956.
  • Hillert, L.; Berglind, N.; Arnetz, BB; Bellander, T. (Febrero 2002). «Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey». Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 28(1), pp. 33-41. PMID 11871850.

Reviews and reports

  • Irvine, N. (2005). «Definition, epidemiology and management of electrical sensitivity». Report for the Radiation Protection Division of the UK Health Protection Agency, HPA-RPD-010.
  • Levitt, B. Blake. (1995). Electromagnetic Fields. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Company. pp. 181-218.

Studies on symptoms and health

  • Carlsson, F.; Karlson, B.; Orbaek, P.; Osterberg, K.; Ostergren, PO. (Julio 2005). «Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning». Public Health, 119(7), pp. 568-577. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2004.07.011. PMID 15925670.
  • Real, William; Pan, Yagn; Yenyves, Ervin; Sujisawa, Iehiko; Suyama, Hideo; Samadi, Nasrola; Ross, Gerald. (1991). «Electromagnetic field sensitivity». Journal of Bioelectricity, 10, pp. 241-256.

Neurophysiology and electrical sensitivity

  • Lyskov, E.; Sandström, M.; Hansson Mild, K. (Noviembre 2001). «Neurophysiological study of patients with perceived ‘electrical hypersensitivity'». International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42(3), pp. 233-241. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00141-6. PMID 11812390.
  • Landgrebe, M.; Hauser, S.; Langguth, B.; Frick, U.; Hajak, G.; Eichhammer, P. (Marzo 2007). «Altered cortical excitability in subjectively electrosensitive patients: results of a pilot study». Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62(3), pp. 283-288. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.007. PMID 17324677.
  • Sandström, M.; Lyskov, E.; Berglund, A.; Medvedev, S.; Mild, KH. (Enero 1997). «Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity». Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 39(1), pp. 15-22. doi:10.1097/00043764-199701000-00006. PMID 9029427.

Studies on mobile telephony and EMF exposure

  • Eltiti, S.; Wallace, D.; Ridgewell, A.; et al. (November 2007). «Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study». Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(11), pp. 1603-1608. doi:10.1289/ehp.10286. PMID 18007992.
  • Regel, Sabine; Negovetic, Sonja; Roosli, Martin; Berdinas, Veronica; Schuderer, Jurgen; Huss, Anke; Lott, Urs; Kuster, Niels; Achermann, Peter. (August 2006). «UMTS Base Station-like Exposure, Well-Being, and Cognitive Performance». Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(8), pp. 1270-1275. doi:10.1289/ehp.8934. PMID 16882538. PMC 1552030.
  • Rubin, James; Hahn, G.; Everitt, BS; Clear, AJ; Wessely, Simon. (2006). «Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study». British Medical Journal, 332(7546), pp. 886-889. doi:10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55. PMID 16520326. PMC 1440612.
  • Wilen, J.; Johansson, A.; Kalezic, N.; Lyskov, E.; Sandstrom, M. (Abril 2006). «Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms». Bioelectromagnetics, 27(3), pp. 204-214. doi:10.1002/bem.20195. PMID 16304699.

Additional support and resources

Other relevant studies

  • Schreier, N.; Huss, A.; Röösli, M. (2006). «The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland». Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 51(4), pp. 202-209. doi:10.1007/s00038-006-5061-2. PMID 17193782.
  • Eltiti, S.; Wallace, D.; Zougkou, K.; et al. (Febrero 2007). «Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire». Bioelectromagnetics, 28(2), pp. 137-151. doi:10.1002/bem.20279. PMID 17013888.
  • Bergqvist, U.; Vogel, E.; Aringer, L.; Cunningham, J.; Gobba, F.; Leitgeb, N.; Miro, L.; Neubauer, G.; Ruppe, I.; Vecchia, P.; Wadman, C. (1997). «Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V.» Arbete och Halsa, 19.